Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

I agree, we are all immersed in weakly ionizing radiation all of the time, worse during storms or if you happen to live near a Doppler weather radar tower... You guys might want to check out my Google Earth maps of 10 months of increased fish kills, algae blooms, sinkholes and waterspouts, they ar

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

http://www.bikiniatoll.com/whatrad.html IMHO, LENR nanoparticle based reactions in the ocean neutralize radioactive isotopes. For example, the ocean around Bikini atoll is now clean and it has be clean for a long time now.. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:35 PM, James Bowery wrote: > Speaking of wh

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Blaze Spinnaker wrote: "There was no disaster in the fourth reactor." > > You should update the Wikipedia with your knowledge here. They're working > under a different set of assumptions. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster > > "On 15 March, an explosion damaged t

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Bad advice. Tuna don't do numbers any better than chickens . On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:39 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > We need to ask the Tuna > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:35 PM, James Bowery wrote: > >> Speak

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

We need to ask the Tuna On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:35 PM, James Bowery wrote: > Speaking of which, what would actually happen if they just dumped all the > waste into the ocean? I mean what do the _numbers_ look like? The ocean > is _very_ big. > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:19 AM, ChemE Stew

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Speaking of which, what would actually happen if they just dumped all the waste into the ocean? I mean what do the _numbers_ look like? The ocean is _very_ big. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:19 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Right, > > But they still need water. Good thing they had an ocean close by

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

“The San Onofre facility was opened in the late 1960s and has been upgraded since then, although not without incident. Engineers at the Bechtel Group Inc. of San Francisco installed a 420-ton nuclear reactor vessel at the facility in 1977, only to be publically humiliated when it was realized that

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Right, But they still need water. Good thing they had an ocean close by to hide their sins. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > ChemE Stewart wrote: > > >> "So, if the reactors had not been running there would be no disaster" >> >> "Idle", loaded reactors, and spent fuel p

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

"There was no disaster in the fourth reactor." You should update the Wikipedia with your knowledge here. They're working under a different set of assumptions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster "On 15 March, an explosion damaged the fourth floor rooftop area of unit

RE: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Blaze Spinnaker wrote: Another tsunami could come up and dredge all that out to the ocean and currents will drag it over to the west coast of NA. What the West Coast should be terrified of … in terms of a potential nuclear catastrophe - has nothing to do with Japan. http://rt.c

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

" A tsunami does not dredge the ocean." Ahh, ok. Who are you talking to, btw? On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > > Another tsunami could come up and dredge all that out to the ocean and >> currents will drag it over to the west coast of NA. >> >

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

I wrote: > There was no disaster in the fourth reactor. > In fact, TEPCO was planning to restart the fourth reactor, until the Prime Minister and the press heard about it. This was before the government decided to shut down nearly every nuke in Japan. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

ChemE Stewart wrote: > "So, if the reactors had not been running there would be no disaster" > > "Idle", loaded reactors, and spent fuel pools still require continuous > cooling water. > There was no disaster in the fourth reactor. Therefore, the cooling capacity was sufficient, even though it

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Blaze Spinnaker wrote: Another tsunami could come up and dredge all that out to the ocean and > currents will drag it over to the west coast of NA. > No, that is not possible. A tsunami does not dredge the ocean. You can see what it does in the many videos taken of the disaster. A wave, by defin

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Yeah, and the Japanese are amongst the most safety conscious, technically advanced, and nuclear sophisticated cultures in the entire world. The fact that they were so unready for this does not bode well for the rest of the world. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:00 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Jed, > >

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Jed, There will always be a series of events that lead up to any/all disasters of this sort. The fact is we have had at least 3 major nuclear incidents in 35 years, that is once every approx. 12 years. Expect another one within the same period. "So, if the reactors had not been running there wo

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Another tsunami could come up and dredge all that out to the ocean and currents will drag it over to the west coast of NA. Tsnuami is a japanese word for a reason. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > This is silly. The fourth reactor is not badly damaged. The fuel rods will >

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

This is silly. The fourth reactor is not badly damaged. The fuel rods will be removed from it soon. Even if another earthquake of the same magnitude occurs the building will not collapse. The reactor buildings were not seriously damaged by earthquake itself. Even if they had been at epicenter, if t

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/radiation-japan-nuclear-plant-arrives-alaska-coast-145848911.html I live on the west coast. Joy. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Sounds like the DOE is getting involved > > > http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/us-energy-chief-offers-

Re: [Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

Sounds like the DOE is getting involved http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/us-energy-chief-offers-japan-aid-nuke-cleanup-20737047 On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM, wrote: > David Suzuki issues ominous warning for damaged Fukushima plant > > > http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/da

[Vo]:Suzuki's ominous warning on Fukushima

David Suzuki issues ominous warning for damaged Fukushima plant http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/david-suzuki-issues-ominous-warning-damaged-fukushima-plant-195522191.html David Suzuki has issued an ominous warning about the state of Fukushima's nuclear power plant. "Fukushima is the most