In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Fri, 27 May 2011 20:01:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
At 07:01 PM 5/27/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Fri, 27 May 2011 15:55:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The detection
of iron in the used sample is
even stranger: there
At 01:54 PM 5/27/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Tip to : Peter Ekström: Kall fusion åter i hetluften
http://energycatalyzer.blogspot.com/2011/05/peter-ekstrom-kall-fusion-ater-i.html
Points to
http://www.fysikersamfundet.se/Fysikaktuellt/2011_2.pdf (in Swedish).
(Too large to translate, says
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Fri, 27 May 2011 15:55:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The detection
of iron in the used sample is
even stranger: there is no reaction
with positive Q-value, i.e. positive
developed energy, which leads from the nickel
to iron.
Actually there is:-
Ni62 + H =
At 07:01 PM 5/27/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Fri, 27 May 2011 15:55:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The detection
of iron in the used sample is
even stranger: there is no reaction
with positive Q-value, i.e. positive
developed energy, which leads from the
4 matches
Mail list logo
