On Nov 22, 2012, at 3:15 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> The building is reportedly stronger, and more earthquake proof than
> conventional buildings would be, and despite that it takes less material to
> make.
>
I would say that it is more resilient _because_ it takes less material to make.
Ligh
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> This is the scary part.
>
>
> 2012/11/21 Jed Rothwell
>
>> The building is *reportedly* stronger
>>
>
Oh come now. There are many first-rate architects and engineers in China.
Before they spend a huge sum of money and build the world's tall
Totally 3D printed.
This is the scary part.
2012/11/21 Jed Rothwell
> The building is *reportedly* stronger
>
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha wrote:
I think this is not a breakthrough properly. They are just not ashamed of
> making that big structures can be ugly and cheap as long as it works.
That is true. That is why I say this would be idea for food factories and
other large industrial complexes.
Besides, the build
I think this is not a breakthrough properly. They are just not ashamed of
making that big structures can be ugly and cheap as long as it works.
Besides, the building is probably already built, it just has to be
assembled in place.
2012/11/21 Jed Rothwell
> Finally, a breakthrough in the constr
Finally, a breakthrough in the construction of large buildings. See:
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/11/20/china-plans-to-build-the-worlds-largest-skyscraper-in-just-90-days/
This will open the way to things like gigantic food factories (indoor
farms).
- Jed
7 matches
Mail list logo
