At 03:12 PM 10/14/2010, Jones Beene wrote:
He is probably a well-read grad student with a personality disorder.
That would be ScienceApologist, the Wikipedia pseudoskeptic.
At 10:13 PM 10/13/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It does not matter who he is.
Yes and no. Once I recognized the style, even if it isn't
ScienceApologist, I can see where this would go. He would never give
up. And he knows arguments that he hasn't presented yet. He's been
doing this for years.
At 10:45 PM 10/13/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
The temperature difference involved with excess heat is *usually* --
except for so-called heat-after-death -- a matter of a few degrees
at most. In other words, it should
At 09:25 PM 10/13/2010, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
It goes on.
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/oct/11/cold-fusion/
Good place for me to stop. Kemosabe has obsessively added many
responses, that demonstrate to anyone who is watching, and who is
netural, the bankruptcy of his
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Good place for me to stop. Kemosabe has obsessively added many
responses, that demonstrate to anyone who is watching, and who is
neutral, the bankruptcy of his position.
Of interest:
This writer called Kemosabe has been posting the standard skeptical
arguments as comments to
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/oct/09/cold-science-heats-up/#c202969.
He has now shown familiarity with some rather obscure arguments that
someone who had not followed Wikipedia process
Why not e-mail tjgrea...@columbiatribune.com and ask him, if it does not go
against their policy, to expand the header from one of the comments. TJ
might claim that anonymity is to be protected even in comments ... and all
of that, but he might not care - if he also thinks the guy is an
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why not e-mail tjgrea...@columbiatribune.com and ask him, if it does not go
against their policy, to expand the header from one of the comments. TJ
might claim that anonymity is to be protected even in comments ... and all
of that, but he might not care -
It goes on.
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/oct/11/cold-fusion/
Kemosabe is clearly someone who knows the skeptical arguments very
well. He's repeating them, even when they've been totally
deconstructed in the past. He doesn't ever present the other side,
the facts that might allow
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
The temperature difference involved with excess heat is *usually* -- except
for so-called heat-after-death -- a matter of a few degrees at most. In
other words, it should have almost no effect on permeation, and, as well,
this would not at all
10 matches
Mail list logo
