No, Harry it really does not. No more than it matters why cold fusion
works. I was merely responding to a comment on this thread with my
own hair-brained ideas.
Regardless of *how* it works, the principles have now decided that
they must throw down the gauntlet. Scrutiny is being brought to bea
On 1/2/2008 11:30 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 5:39 PM, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A regular poster to Vo, who will remain unnamed, may
>> want to chime-in with an appropriate anecdote here,
>> about a magnetic motor being developed which shows a
>> much greater dT
On Jan 31, 2008 5:39 PM, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A regular poster to Vo, who will remain unnamed, may
> want to chime-in with an appropriate anecdote here,
> about a magnetic motor being developed which shows a
> much greater dT than what JLN has shown... or not.
Odd, I just fini
--- George Hathaway wrote:
> "Although I could believe that a tiny amount of
magneotcaloric effect is taking place in the
Newman/Bedini/etc etc devices, I claim it would
be undetectable certainly by any such method as
Jean-Louis is using."
Well - his results speak for themself, and they do to
ma
Esa,
It is well known that "pulse" or "burp" charging of secondary (as
well as primary batteries) can make the battery appear to accept more
charge than conventional charging, and do a more efficient job of
charging >when done properly<. This is due to several factors such as
prevention of
Jones,
Although I could believe that a tiny amount of magneotcaloric effect
is taking place in the Newman/Bedini/etc etc devices, I claim it would
be undetectable certainly by any such method as Jean-Louis is using.
Magnetic cooling of the type I presume you are describing requires a
cyclic
George Hathaway wrote:
Thomas,
I know of no "free energy" devices which originally claimed they
became cooler while operating and which actually demonstrated this fact
under controlled conditions. This includes Newman, Sweet, MEG and
variants, Fogal "transistor" and many others.
I'm afr
George,
Yes. I absolutely believe that Naudin measured an
actual and accurate (tiny) heat loss, and in a
situation where there should have been a rather strong
heating effect ... Is this remarkable?
No! not really, and it does not verify the Newman
motor as being an anomaly either, or cohering ZP
Jones,
If this is considered proper calorimetry, we're in serious trouble.
I would suggest checking out http://fluidproperties.nist.gov/cvht.html
for a NIST fluid calorimeter or even
http://earthtech.org/capabilities/dual/ for example calorimeters in
which one could have a high degree of co
On 31/01/2008, George Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I investigated the Newman device shortly after Hastings and
> found no such thermal anomaly (although the apparent battery recharging
> phenomenon was intriguing for a while until I realized what was actually
> happening).
>
what did yo
--- George Hathaway wrote:
> "I know of no "free energy" devices which originally
claimed they became cooler while operating and which
actually demonstrated this fact under controlled
conditions."
George,
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/NMac0709.htm
Thomas,
I know of no "free energy" devices which originally claimed they
became cooler while operating and which actually demonstrated this fact
under controlled conditions. This includes Newman, Sweet, MEG and variants,
Fogal "transistor" and many others. None of these inventors has bothe
12 matches
Mail list logo
