I propse that the primary motive force responsible for the tracks in
the CO2 mist is not an air stream impacting on the mist. An air
thread serves as an electrical bridge, but it is the local charging of
the mist and the subsequent self repulsion among the charges that is
primary force behind the
Am 04.12.2011 14:30, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Some relevant quotes of interest from Bill Beaty at:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
"The "threads" can survive in a zero-field region. I made a crude
"thread gun" and passed a thread through an accelerator ring composed
of an aluminum
Some relevant quotes of interest from Bill Beaty at:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
"The "threads" can survive in a zero-field region. I made a crude
"thread gun" and passed a thread through an accelerator ring composed
of an aluminum bundt pan. I didn't expect this to work, sin
On Dec 4, 2011, at 4:09 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 13:40, schrieb Horace Heffner:
I am familiar with air ions. The phenomenon measured by Bill
Beaty in the presence of much water vapor, and having nano-amp
current, I think is not made of non-polarized air molecules, but
of
Am 04.12.2011 13:40, schrieb Horace Heffner:
I am familiar with air ions. The phenomenon measured by Bill Beaty in
the presence of much water vapor, and having nano-amp current, I think
is not made of non-polarized air molecules, but of a contiguous string
of polarized molecules. Here is on
On Dec 4, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 05:07, schrieb Horace Heffner:
That is because Bill did not call them "water thread" experiments.
My mistake, and bad memory. The above wasser.html reference was
indeed about water bridge experiments, not Bill Beaty's air thr
Am 04.12.2011 05:07, schrieb Horace Heffner:
That is because Bill did not call them "water thread" experiments. My
mistake, and bad memory. The above wasser.html reference was indeed
about water bridge experiments, not Bill Beaty's air thread
experiments, which are a very different thing - t
2011/12/3 Peter Heckert :
> Am 03.12.2011 22:14, schrieb Harry Veeder:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckert
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe there is a vacuum for these reasons:
>>>
>>> 1) I placed a charged needle 1-2 cm above a water surface. The air blow
>>> makes a sharp, mm deep
On Dec 3, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 01:41, schrieb Horace Heffner:
This is about the water bridge experiment, not Bill Beaty's water
thread experiments.
His fine threads extended multiple times the length of the water
bridge, and were sustained indefinitely, w
Am 04.12.2011 01:41, schrieb Horace Heffner:
This is about the water bridge experiment, not Bill Beaty's water
thread experiments.
His fine threads extended multiple times the length of the water
bridge, and were sustained indefinitely, with orders of magnitude less
current. Read the archiv
On Dec 3, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Another video (62 minutes) about the water thread experiment:
http://youtu.be/N1At3Gcd-No
Its from SETI and demonstrates the science behind.
It coveres everything from flow to conductivity to bubbles to
thermographic measurements and heavy wa
Am 04.12.2011 01:16, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Another video (62 minutes) about the water thread experiment:
http://youtu.be/N1At3Gcd-No
Its from SETI and demonstrates the science behind.
It coveres everything from flow to conductivity to bubbles to
thermographic measurements and heavy water expe
Another video (62 minutes) about the water thread experiment:
http://youtu.be/N1At3Gcd-No
Its from SETI and demonstrates the science behind.
It coveres everything from flow to conductivity to bubbles to
thermographic measurements and heavy water experiments.
Very interesting are the Schlieren p
Am 04.12.2011 00:29, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 00:01, schrieb Peter Heckert:
I dont believe, he used this for the water thread experiment.
This needs more current.
I tried with deionized water, but my supply was too week. It should
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Oops! I should have read the whole "air" thread!
For those who might not know, Bill Beaty is our list owner. He has 56
science videos, 22,000 subscribers and 14 M viewings:
http://www.youtube.com/user/wbeaty?feature=watch
T
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
>
>> BTW, you might enjoy checking the archives for posts by Bill Beaty on the
>> ability of HV needle tips to generate threads of water molecules from
>> humidity in the air. Some thread
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
> BTW, you might enjoy checking the archives for posts by Bill Beaty on the
> ability of HV needle tips to generate threads of water molecules from
> humidity in the air. Some thread names I recall are "Air threads" and
> "Filament ion jets" f
On Dec 3, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 04.12.2011 00:01, schrieb Peter Heckert:
I dont believe, he used this for the water thread experiment.
This needs more current.
I tried with deionized water, but my supply was too week. It
should deliver about 100µA.
Its a TV split diode f
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 22:57, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Here are some URLs related to Bill Beaty's air threads:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_prcDanfMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLG8gKb-lyk
http://www
Am 04.12.2011 00:01, schrieb Peter Heckert:
I dont believe, he used this for the water thread experiment.
This needs more current.
I tried with deionized water, but my supply was too week. It should
deliver about 100µA.
Its a TV split diode flyback transformer driven by a selfbuild
electronics
On Dec 3, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:51, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water
Am 03.12.2011 23:51, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Yes, this experiment was made by
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Yes, this experiment was made by others too and published in
science journal
Am 03.12.2011 22:57, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Here are some URLs related to Bill Beaty's air threads:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_prcDanfMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLG8gKb-lyk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKvLUL8f4LU
http://amasci.com/
On Dec 3, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
I see they missed the possibility the water is held together by
volume related *structural* changes. Incredible!
Her
Am 03.12.2011 23:00, schrieb Horace Heffner:
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Yes, this experiment was made by others too and published in science
journals.
It must be seen that a strong current flows thro
Say, Bill Beaty's experiments made it as a reference on wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_thread_experiment
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Here are some URLs related to Bill Beaty's air threads:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_prcDanfMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLG8gKb-lyk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKvLUL8f4LU
http://amasci.com/freenrg/iontest.html
Best regards,
Horace He
Am 03.12.2011 22:14, schrieb Harry Veeder:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
I believe there is a vacuum for these reasons:
1) I placed a charged needle 1-2 cm above a water surface. The air blow
makes a sharp, mm deep and mm wide hole into the water surface.
If I assume, t
On Dec 3, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.12.2011 16:20, schrieb Horace Heffner:
I suggest that the dark zone at the tip of the needle is not due
to a vacuum there. It is more likely due to the average delay for
recombination of the ions and electrons. Electron recombination
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
> Am 03.12.2011 16:20, schrieb Horace Heffner:
>>
>> I suggest that the dark zone at the tip of the needle is not due to a
>> vacuum there. It is more likely due to the average delay for recombination
>> of the ions and electrons. Electron reco
Am 03.12.2011 16:20, schrieb Horace Heffner:
I suggest that the dark zone at the tip of the needle is not due to a
vacuum there. It is more likely due to the average delay for
recombination of the ions and electrons. Electron recombination with
ions is likely what produces most of the light.
I suggest that the dark zone at the tip of the needle is not due to a
vacuum there. It is more likely due to the average delay for
recombination of the ions and electrons. Electron recombination with
ions is likely what produces most of the light.
This is not to say fusion will not occur a
Hi,
my idea is this:
place a needle in a pressurized deuterium stream and charge it to some
100 kV.
My previous experiments have shown, that a stream of nonconductive gas
is able to conduct electricity.
For example a ordinary needle placed in dry air will cause an ion wind,
if charged to 10
34 matches
Mail list logo
