I've been reading the LENR library ... (mainly looking at theory) and note that
Duncan gave an "outsider's" view of cf history at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DuncanRanoutsider.pdf ICCF 15, 2009
(Of course ... he warns against media-release of scientific dicoveries ... )
- Original Messag
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
Estimates are that $200 M has been spent on cold fusion research in 22
> years.
Just out curiosity, how do we know that number? Has there been a study?
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
> I disagree. Terrible idea, terrible article. Estimates are that $200 M has
> been spent on cold fusion research in 22 years. If that's not enough to
> generate unequivocal evidence of *heat* from nuclear reactions in a
> small-scale, table-to
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> SRI and the ENEA have done robust, long running, credible experiments for 20
> years, albeit at low output. Skeptics, the DoE and most of academia have
> paid no attention to them.
McKubre (paraphrased): It's illegal to make tritium in the Un
On Dec 3, 2011, at 10:36 AM, David ledin wrote:
Rob Duncan, vice chancellor of research at the University of Missouri
going to establish a national research program that would help
scientists study cold fusion .
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/dec/03/mu-research-chief-
wants-cold-fus
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
> Good idea, good article.
I disagree. Terrible idea, terrible article. Estimates are that $200 M has
been spent on cold fusion research in 22 years. If that's not enough to
generate unequivocal evidence of *heat* from nuclear reactions in a
smal
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Mary Yugo wrote:
>
> We need more robust, long running, high output, credible experiments.
>>
>
> SRI and the ENEA have done robust, long running, credible experiments for
> 20 years, albeit at low output.
>
You can't call something credible
strange it is not already done,
and if it is a scam it is strange nobody official in the world (US,...), in
europe, in italy/greece, having access to legal data there, signal the scam
if one...
I've asked to Areva about their opinion on LENR E-cat and Hyperion, and my
message disapeared, yet the q
Hi,
On 3-12-2011 21:19, Peter Heckert wrote:
They should buy an e-cat and a hyperion and see if it works.
I agree, but I don't think you can buy any Hyperion at all in the next
two years, as Defkalion seems to be only a so-called "Technology
Transfer Company".
This means they either have no
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
> They should buy an e-cat and a hyperion and see if it works.
>
Sure. But how and when? I've been following Defkalion's forum and what
they claim is completely unsupported by the slightest facts. And Rossi
consistently resists any indepen
Am 03.12.2011 20:57, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Mary Yugo mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
We need more robust, long running, high output, credible experiments.
SRI and the ENEA have done robust, long running, credible experiments
for 20 years, albeit at low output. Skeptics, the DoE and mo
Mary Yugo wrote:
We need more robust, long running, high output, credible experiments.
>
SRI and the ENEA have done robust, long running, credible experiments for
20 years, albeit at low output. Skeptics, the DoE and most of academia have
paid no attention to them. They could do another 20 years
Good idea, good article. But at least at first, such a program should be
focused on testing claims for existing phenomena and results and not on
blue sky theorizing about how or why such reactions might take place. That
would serve the country best, IMO. We have lots of theory. We need more
rob
Rob Duncan, vice chancellor of research at the University of Missouri
going to establish a national research program that would help
scientists study cold fusion .
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/dec/03/mu-research-chief-wants-cold-fusion-puzzle-solved/
14 matches
Mail list logo
