I don't think the Penon report proves it didn't work. We will find out in
court. Why do you think it does?
What about the QuarkX?
AA
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: Vortex
Sent: Wed, Jun 7, 2017 2:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:new thread --- apres Rossi e
Adrian Ashfield wrote:
> Brian Ahern insists on proof for LENR experiments but somehow doesn't
>> require proof to proclaim the E-Cat, the SunCell & Brillouin don't work.
>
>
The Penon report proves that the E-Cat does not work. I do not know about
the other two. The Penon report is here:
http
s, nobody outside those groups really knows yet.
> AA
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jones Beene
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, Jun 6, 2017 10:41 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:new thread --- apres Rossi era looming
>
> Brian Ahern wrote:
>
> > After 28
nt: Tue, Jun 6, 2017 10:41 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:new thread --- apres Rossi era looming
Brian Ahern wrote:
> After 28 years nobody has succeeded in generating 100 watts excess in
a repeatable process. In fact there is no qualified system that can
achieve 10 watts excess and a COP > 1.5
... a
ject: Re: [Vo]:new thread --- apres Rossi era looming
Brian Ahern wrote:
> After 28 years nobody has succeeded in generating 100 watts excess in
a repeatable process. In fact there is no qualified system that can
achieve 10 watts excess and a COP > 1.5
... and Bob Cook says I'm too cynical ...
pen.)
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 7:57 PM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:new thread --- apres Rossi era looming
As observed in the Holmlid experiments, LENR energy could be formated into the
form of subato
As observed in the Holmlid experiments, LENR energy could be formated into
the form of subatomic particles that are hard to detect.
These hard to detect subatomic particles could be carrying off any
remaining residual LENR based kinetic energy from the reaction site. There
may be a method that ca
Brian Ahern wrote:
> After 28 years nobody has succeeded in generating 100 watts excess in
a repeatable process. In fact there is no qualified system that can
achieve 10 watts excess and a COP > 1.5
... and Bob Cook says I'm too cynical ...
Jones has identified the lack of significant excess heat fro PdD and NiH
systems.
After 28 years nobody has succeeded in generating 100 watts excess in a
repeatable process. In fact there is no qualified system that can achieve 10
watts excess and a COP > 1.5
Perhaps we are trapped in the wr
9 matches
Mail list logo
