In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:02:02 EST:
Hi Frank,
[snip]
>>A condensate that is strongly stimulated in the RF spectrum should generate
>
>>radio waves.
>
>
>
>Why?
Thanks for the explanation, but it's not an answer to the question. The question
is why should a
Darn. :-(
If I hadn't goofed again, the quark meter*hertz is the same as that of the
electron or ositron
47.47 megahertz
I think. :-)
Fred
On Jan 24, 2008 5:24 AM, Frederick Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> The energy (E) of a wave-particle-string is: E = hf, f - c/Lambda
>
I forgot to divide the proton energy 1.49E-10 joule by 3.0 (4.96E-11 joule)
to get the quark frequency of 7.49E22 hertz.
Thus the quark wave-particle-string is 4.96e-11 * 7.49E22 = 3.713E12meter*hertz
What does it all mean for a "Length Only" String Theory (circle or straight,
quark) stationary en
Hi Frank,
The energy (E) of a wave-particle-string is: E = hf, f - c/Lambda
Lambda for the electron or positron is h/2(pi)rmc = 3.86E-13 meters,
E = mc^2 = 8.19E-14 joule
f = 1.237E20 Hertz
The meter*Hertz = 3.86E-13*1.23E20 = 47.47 megahertz
For a quark 1/3 the mass of a proton-antiproton La
Re: [Vo]:stimulation frequency
Robin van Spaandonk
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:52 -0800
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:57:45 EST:
Hi,
[snip]
>A condensate that is strongly stimulated in the RF spectrum should generate
>radio waves.
Wh
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:57:45 EST:
Hi,
[snip]
>A condensate that is strongly stimulated in the RF spectrum should generate
>radio waves.
Why?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub is a plant.
I believe that the stimulation frequency is a major issue. What binds the
proton condensation? Phonons.
These phonon bonds are weak. Convention has it to cool the condensate. The
cooling will eliminate
lattice vibrations from disrupting the condensate. The cooling process,
needless to sa
7 matches
Mail list logo
