I wrote:
It is not sufficient to get measurable heat in one of these devices and not
> see x-rays; it would be necessary to get high power densities. It is this
> latter observable that I have yet to see correlated with low radiation
> levels.
>
I did not say that as clearly as I meant to -- it
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Yes! They sure do assume that. So far, there has been practically no
> evidence that cold fusion produces dangerous radiation.
>
I'm less concerned about radioactive byproducts (e.g., tritium -- although
this is an excellent point I forgot abo
On Aug 17, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
If there is no neutrons, there will be no tritium. Pure protium
will poduce no tritium.
Yes, this is obviously true, Axil. The question is, How is the neutron
formed? It can not be formed outside of the nucleus as a free neutron
because this
If there is no neutrons, there will be no tritium. Pure *protium* will
poduce no tritium.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Eric Walker wrote:
>
>
>> A laptop nowadays draws 50 to 100 W. I assume future ones will draw ~25
>>> W. Imagine a small but intense 50 W heat sour
Eric Walker wrote:
> A laptop nowadays draws 50 to 100 W. I assume future ones will draw ~25 W.
>> Imagine a small but intense 50 W heat source powering a
>>
>
> thermoelectric chip, with a large radiator behind that to spread out the
>> heat. That would be doable I think.
>>
>
> While I'm symp
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A laptop nowadays draws 50 to 100 W. I assume future ones will draw ~25 W.
> Imagine a small but intense 50 W heat source powering a thermoelectric
> chip, with a large radiator behind that to spread out the heat. That would
> be doable I think
*The evanescent wave*
There is an EMF power amplification factor of up to 10 to the 15 power
experimentally demonstrated by nanolenzes formed by nanowires and
nanoparticles.
This is before the chemical probes that measure this power level are
destroyed by the EMF originating from the “hot spot".
David Roberson wrote:
I suspect that the lower power products that are mentioned, such as a
> laptop computer will still need connection to a power generation source
> that is external. The electrical power they need requires the release of
> far too much low quality heat for its local generatio
Of course, but I was responding to your, technically correct but,
misleading statement "Even early into a cold fusion era there will be few
uses for a megawatt generator."
Its true that the there will be few such uses even early on, but one of
those few will be very big early into the cold fusion
find better processes than we can imagine with our limited
knowledge.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Aug 16, 2013 3:23 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:the future of PdD LENR is not technological
Axil Axil wrote:
So users of big process power from high grade
-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Aug 16, 2013 3:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:the future of PdD LENR is not technological
James Bowery wrote:
Drop-in replacements for coal-burners in electrical power plants looks like a
quick win if the ECat-HT can be made self-sustaining via
to the world and any additional major delays must be avoided.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Aug 16, 2013 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:the future of PdD LENR is not technological
So users of big process power from high grade heat are steel mills, cement
Axil Axil wrote:
So users of big process power from high grade heat are steel mills, cement
> plants, glass plants, petrochemical refiners, cargo ship, train engines,
> earth movers, aircraft, trucks, autos, water desalination, buses, pumps,
> mines...
>
Most process heat will come directly from
James Bowery wrote:
> Drop-in replacements for coal-burners in electrical power plants looks
> like a quick win if the ECat-HT can be made self-sustaining via acting
> cooling control.
>
For a few decades perhaps, but after that the power companies will be going
out of business. They will not b
So users of big process power from high grade heat are steel mills, cement
plants, glass plants, petrochemical refiners, cargo ship, train engines,
earth movers, aircraft, trucks, autos, water desalination, buses, pumps,
mines...
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>
>
>
> On F
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Peter Gluck wrote:
>
>
>> Megawatts are better than kilowatts and kilowatts are better than
>> milliwatts.
>>
>
> Probably not in the long term. Most devices use ~100 W. In the future I
> expect all power supplies to be self-contained, with
I doubt 100W will heat your grand-grandson's house or
drive4 the aircon but if you know it better... The Cold Fusion promise was
for unlimited energy.
Please teach me how to interpret he last sentence of the paper.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Peter Gluck wrote
Peter Gluck wrote:
> Megawatts are better than kilowatts and kilowatts are better than
> milliwatts.
>
Probably not in the long term. Most devices use ~100 W. In the future I
expect all power supplies to be self-contained, with no central generation
or even household generators. I mean that eve
Dear Jed,
I'm always trying to make sharp distinctions, and the best.
Megawatts are better than kilowatts and kilowatts are better than
milliwatts.
Perhaps each have their specific market however I have serious doubts for
milliwatts- energy sources for the pacemakers of cardiopathic artists in
the
What the Ni/H reactor does is to convert heat into concentrated electric
and magnetic fields. Pure hydrogen is required to perform this function.
The first step in this conversion process is to convert heat into dipole
oscillations. Hydrogen helps to do this by trapping infrared photons that
fall
about have to be either in the 10 to 250 W range or the >4kW thermal range for
existing off the shelf conversion.
D2
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:09:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:the future of PdD LENR is not technological
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Peter Gluck wrote:
Peter Gluck wrote:
> I have just published:
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/why-pd-d-lenr-will-never-work.html
>
I think you are making distinctions that do not exist in nature. Cold
fusion is cold fusion. The smallest Pd-D effect is probably the same as
what Rossi observes. Research
Dear Friends
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/why-pd-d-lenr-will-never-work.html
Time can and will show if I was right. Anyway, the mission of
truth is to help problem solving and progress even it makes
some people unhappy and even angry.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
23 matches
Mail list logo
