Hi Ed,
There are certain truisms about the subject of Cold Fusion.
Scientific research and knowledge gained is cumulative by publishing
results of failures and success of basic research.
Ever rising worldwide interest and continued research adds to the empirical
data base toward furtheri
On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
Jed has suggested another letter to the Yale Newspaper and that
several people have expressed an interest in signing such letter.
I believe we have beat the reality of cold fusion to death and need
to raise the issue to a new level. Ther
I have no objection to the letter being improved. However, I think a
letter signed by a collection of Ph.D.s and other scientists would be
more impressive than asking her attitude of a general letter. Without
something new, of course she would say no. The "new" is the obvious
general support
This is a good letter, but it does not directly address the issues
raised by Kevles in her rebuttal, so the editor may not publish it.
Typically, editors will not extend a debate when it seems to be
expanding into new territory or veering off into unrelated subject
matter. (Also, they do not li
Jed has suggested another letter to the Yale Newspaper and that several
people have expressed an interest in signing such letter. I believe we
have beat the reality of cold fusion to death and need to raise the
issue to a new level. Therefore, I have provided another letter and ask
if anyone
5 matches
Mail list logo
