"Iconoclastic" -
Adj. Characterized by attack on the established belief structureor
the institutions which uphold it.
How cana nearby spiral galaxy contain a quasar whose light spectrum
indicates that it is billions of light years away?
It cannot if the normal, and almost universally held,
I am not committed to big bang cosmology, but are there any non-big bang
theories which predict the observed 2.7K cosmic background radiation?
Harry
Harry,
are there any non-big bang theories which predict the
observed 2.7K cosmic background radiation?
Many. You mention the fringes of one theory, which is just
now emerging, in your second post. To the contrary of what
they state in that piece, there is adequate if not
convincing reason to
Dewey Larson's Reciprocal System shows it as a necessary consequence, as
well as
gamma ray bursts and cosmic rays:
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkvk/index.htm
http://www.rstheory.com/
No big bang.
No black holes.
No gravity waves.
No magnetic monopoles.
Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale, Arizona
Harry Veeder wrote:
I am not committed to big bang cosmology, but are there any non-big bang
theories which predict the observed 2.7K cosmic background radiation?
Harry
Actually, the prediction of the the big bang theory was a 25K background, but
what's a 20-odd K discrepancy between
Michael Foster at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
I am not committed to big bang cosmology, but are there any non-big bang
theories which predict the observed 2.7K cosmic background radiation?
Harry
Actually, the prediction of the the big bang theory was a 25K
Thanks for the link. I had not heard of Dewey Larson.
Harry
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dewey Larson's Reciprocal System shows it as a necessary consequence, as
well as
gamma ray bursts and cosmic rays:
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkvk/index.htm
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:59:07 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Iconoclastic -
Adj. Characterized by attack on the established belief structure or the
institutions which uphold it.
How can a nearby spiral galaxy contain a quasar whose light spectrum indicates
that it is
In reply to Grimer's message of Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:15:50 +:
Hi,
[snip]
Some few observers (outside the mainstream) might consider this finding to
make a 'prima facie case' that red-shift is NOT an accurate measure of
distance, and that there is a very strong gravitational component to
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:44:27 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I am not committed to big bang cosmology, but are there any non-big bang
theories which predict the observed 2.7K cosmic background radiation?
Harry
IMO the 2.7 K is simply degraded starlight. After all, what
Do these other theories imply the size of the observable universe
is different as well?
Harry
Jones Beene at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry,
are there any non-big bang theories which predict the
observed 2.7K cosmic background radiation?
Many. You mention the fringes of one theory,
11 matches
Mail list logo
