please, dont refer to my teachers. i based my statements off my own
reading of darwins work. only way to interpret or critique someones
work is to actually read it yourself. in addition, you assume much,
that i agree with all darwins theories, that i dont speak other
languages, the form of my
once again, you have FAILED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION. a statement that
is patently false has been made, and no explanation has been given.
i toe no party line, and will not argue the shortcomings of many of
darwins thoughts. i simply do not like seeing obvious falsehoods
about ANYONES work. as
leaking pen wrote:
i will say this once again, and then i will ignore you. this is a
SCIENCE discussion list. you wish a religous debate, join a list
designed for religious debate.
Amen.
- Jed
Leaking pen wrote
im wiitiggg.hmm, not so quick on the reply when
youve been called on what youvesaid, and are out of wiggle room, it
seems.On 4/25/05, leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Seems antiquity is loaded with examples of engineering
and architectural works that
On 4/25/05, leaking pen wrote;
that age were intelligent beings and had not degenerated which seems
to contradict the Darwinian theorists.
RC Macaulay wrote:
again, how is the assumption that ancient people were degenerates
darwinian? and... since according to this supposed thought,
please, dont refer to my teachers. i based my statements off my own
reading of darwins work. only way to interpret or critique someones
work is to actually read it yourself. in addition, you assume much,
that i agree with all darwins theories, that i dont speak other
languages, the form of my
6 matches
Mail list logo
