Re: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-28 Thread Horace Heffner
The statement: Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion at very short H-H distances. indicates the author probably hasn't even done a basic seat of the pants calculation as to what this means. This statement is nonsensical or irrelevant when applied to H- H proximity prior to

Re: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-28 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Jones Beene wrote: Resend - Vortex not working -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner The statement: Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion at very short H-H distances. indicates the author probably hasn't even done a basic seat of the

Re: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-28 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Horace Heffner wrote: ones, you have to note the difference between energy and potentials (Keesom), and forces (my formula). That should have read: Jones, you have to note the difference between energy and potentials (Keesom), and forces (my formula). My

Re: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-28 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:42:44 -0800: Hi, [snip] The energy of a Keesom interaction depends on the inverse sixth power of the distance, not the fourth or third. Wouldn't this also mean that it dies off more rapidly with distance, implying that the particles need

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-28 Thread Jones Beene
Hi Robin, notice that the nuclear force also varies with the sixth power of distance, perhaps there is a connection? Good point. I will attempt to engage Dr. Brown in further discourse on this. Another interesting point is It is nevertheless already clear from the above data that entangled

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-27 Thread Jones Beene
Damn! What a coincidence. I was just reading the Brown article. I think he's got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion at very short H-H distances. A must-read ! Jones From: Mark Iverson [ -- Comment 2

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-27 Thread Jones Beene
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol2.pdf#page=50 This is the way I got hold of it. From: Jones Beene Damn! What a coincidence. I was just reading the Brown article. I think he's got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion at very short H-H

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-27 Thread Mark Iverson
Here's an article date 1/17/2011 about an experiment that achieved superluminal velocities... and not just a few times c, but 310c... that's 58 million miles/sec, or 93.0e9 m/s! At that speed, it won't take too long for ET to get home!

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists... RE: the JS Brown paper.

2011-01-27 Thread Mark Iverson
The J.S.Brown paper also says the following which is, I gather, pertinent to LENR (obvious understatement): It is hence reasonable to suppose that, once coherence has been established, the height and width of the effective Coulomb barrier between neighbouring s, p state pairs is reduced, with

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-27 Thread Jones Beene
This niche about dipole-dipole interactions could be even more important within a Casimir cavity, especially if the cavity contains dense deuterium, since the Brown parameters would presumable be closer together than he could ever imagine. The van der Waals interaction comes to mind as the sum

Re: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

2011-01-27 Thread Harry Veeder
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thu, January 27, 2011 11:09:29 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists... Here's an article date 1/17/2011 about an experiment that achieved superluminal velocities... and not just