RE: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium...

2011-05-22 Thread Mark Iverson
AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium... Awkshully, Mark - you covered the H+H situation too, back in Jan: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42057.html but it bears repeating, since Dr Brown did

RE: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium...

2011-05-21 Thread Jones Beene
Awkshully, Mark - you covered the H+H situation too, back in Jan: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42057.html but it bears repeating, since Dr Brown did comment directly to Rossi. The important things which Julian misses IMHO - and which makes this energetic reaction both

RE: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium...

2011-05-20 Thread Mark Iverson
@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium... I beleive that this reference is the same as in my post the dipole constrant On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.net wrote: FYI: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium (Pd