AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in
palladium...
Awkshully, Mark - you covered the H+H situation too, back in Jan:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42057.html
but it bears repeating, since Dr Brown did
Awkshully, Mark - you covered the H+H situation too, back in Jan:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42057.html
but it bears repeating, since Dr Brown did comment directly to Rossi.
The important things which Julian misses IMHO - and which makes this
energetic reaction both
@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: arXiv paper: Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium...
I beleive that this reference is the same as in my post the dipole constrant
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.net wrote:
FYI:
Enhanced low energy fusion rate in palladium (Pd
3 matches
Mail list logo