Re: [Vo]:A cup of coffee and the history of heat

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:05 AM JonesBeene wrote: > *From: *H LV > > > >- The type of "negative temperature" discussed in the article is not >actually colder than absolute zero. It corresponds to something that has >alot of energy so it cannot be called a heat sink. > > > > Maybe

RE: [Vo]:A cup of coffee and the history of heat

From: H LV ➢ The type of "negative temperature" discussed in the article is not actually colder than absolute zero. It corresponds to something that has alot of energy so it cannot be called a heat sink. Maybe not. Firstly, any and all mass contains “a lot of energy” in one appraisal, so

Re: [Vo]:A cup of coffee and the history of heat

The type of "negative temperature" discussed in the article is not actually colder than absolute zero. It corresponds to something that has alot of energy so it cannot be called a heat sink. This "Negative temperature" is a statistical consequence of "population inversion", whereby most of the

Re: [Vo]:A cup of coffee and the history of heat

H LV wrote: Using a cup of coffee as a starting point this blogger provides a friendly introduction to the history of the science of heat. He also leaves the reader with an open question. https://www.beanthinking.org/?tag=caloric Harry Well-named article... even though it chooses to ignore