The following is from Edmund Storms who gave me permission to post his
thoughts pertaining to this subject thread.
***
I gave a lot of thought to what was basic to the process when I
proposed Chemically Assisted Nuclear
Well, Steven - since we are back to name calling - CANR is a good name,
but it may miss the PR-boat (public relations) - particularly if this
field aspires to have an identity that encompasses most of the hydrogen
energy anomalies.
Nuclear decay, fission or fusion do not violate CoE for the
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:10:12 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Isomer energy itself is a newer field that was born out of top secret
military devices like the hafnium or tantalum (gamma) lasers. What the
nature of the loss mass involved consists of - is nebulous: Gluons? Pions?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:10:12 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
However, the real point of this post is that mass assigned to an element
is an average, and the deviation for average is unknown. The range of mass
in any element could be small, which is the mainstream viewpoint -
North Carolina will love it.
T
At 03:30 PM 6/9/2011, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
There has been a lot of debate
pertaining to what might turn out to be
a more accurate descriptive term for Cold Fusion. Should
the
phenomenon be called CANR - Chemically Assisted Nuclear Reactions?
Or
should it be called LENR - Low
6 matches
Mail list logo
