In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:07:03 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Let me try to be more specific on this point:
>
>Ø
>
>Ø Protons do not decay in a cold state, but if accelerated fast enough (as at
>CERN) they will decay to 4 muons after a collision. This does not absolutel
Jones,
Brightsen's Clustron Model of the nucleus also has antimatter in the
nucleus.
I have pdf's of all his papers if anyone is interested.
Ron
--On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 5:58 PM -0700 Jones Beene
wrote:
Of interest - wrt the "9 muon model" of the proton is an old paper
by Harold As
Of interest - wrt the “9 muon model” of the proton is an old paper by Harold
Aspen where he came up with the same conclusion.
http://www.aetherscience.org/www-aspden-org/books/Asp/1988c.pdf
Aspden missed the important detail about binding energy showing up as mass
deficit, but still it is more th
Holmlid's research is worth at least 20 billion euros. CENR wants to build
a Muon factory that cost that huge amount, but has not figured out how to
reduce the energy of the muons that they will produce to low levels.
Holmlid produces very mild muons from the getgo.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:34 PM,
From: Bob Higgins
* Jones, I would like to hear your arguments of evidence that the muons
CAME from the proton.
Bob,
The CERN report is certainly aware of the implications of pair formation. Good
evidence comes from that - and the next best comes as implications from
Holmlid’s papers.
Jones, I would like to hear your arguments of evidence that the muons CAME
from the proton.
My first observation is that muons are ~100MeV particles by positive mass
energy. That says that ~200MeV could wrench a muon - antimuon pair into
existence (presumably from the Dirac sea). Since this was
If Protons are are made of Muons, then could Muons or anti-Muons fired at a
Proton/atom not cause Proton Decay and atomic Transmutation/Fission?
Particle physics isn't my bag, anyone know what results?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Jones Be
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
You don’t see any quarks.
I believe this ad hoc result falls under the notion of "color confinement,"
meaning you don't find partial color charge in the wild. Instead you get a
"hadron jet" of quark-antiquark pairs, whose number depends upon t
Let me try to be more specific on this point:
Ø
Ø Protons do not decay in a cold state, but if accelerated fast enough (as at
CERN) – they will decay to 4 muons after a collision. This does not absolutely
mean that protons are made of muons, but it is an indication of some kind of
cross-
From: John Berry
Ø If Protons were composed of Muons and Anti-Muons, both short lived and
annihilate with each other, how could there be no evidence of Proton Decay?
There is plenty of evidence of the aftermath of proton decay following a high
energy collision, so I’m assuming you mean
If Protons were composed of Muons and Anti-Muons, both short lived and
annihilate with each other, how could there be no evidence of Proton Decay?
I didn't even finish reading, so maybe this was explained later, but that's
all I had the time or head space to observe.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:43 A
A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's resultsJones--
A similar notion of the model of the proton, neutron etc. made up of electrons
and positrons has been presented by Philippi Hatt at the ICCF-19 and also
presented recently to the Russians at their invitation. Peter Gluck also
recentl
Holmlid also states that many other types of sub atomic particles are
produced. Mesons of various types and pions are mentioned. The muon is a
decay product of mesons. It is unclear what is initially produced and what
is a decay product. The higher energy particles have a very short lifetime
compar
13 matches
Mail list logo