From Mark:
...
... and one can start by simply scanning all the
comment sections of websites where a CF story ran, and summarize
each skeptic's question or statement, and counter it with the facts. Keep
it short and sweet, with links to references... the list of Rossi's
Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Now that's a good idea... and one can start by simply scanning all the
comment sections of websites where a CF story ran, and summarize
each skeptic's question or statement, and counter it with the facts.
I have looked at previous compilations of
I wrote:
cold fusion is not a free lunch. I is a lunch you are paid to eat.
Not me! *It* is a lunch you are paid to eat.
this is how experts describe compact fluorescent light bulbs in Scientific
American. their point was that not only to the balls consume less
electricity but they're much
On 2011-04-26 16:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Rossi claims that the nickel will have to be changed out periodically,
every six months or so. I doubt it.
Not only the powder, it's the whole reactor vessel that has to be
replaced periodically. In my opinion this is probably also a safety
measure
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Not only the powder, it's the whole reactor vessel that has to be replaced
periodically. In my opinion this is probably also a safety measure in order
to avoid long-term problems due to prolonged exposure to heat, relatively
high internal
So you don't believe the Ni is transmuted to Cu?
Ron
--On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10:20 AM -0400 Jed Rothwell
jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi claims that the nickel will have to be changed out periodically, every
six months or so. I
doubt it.
- Jed
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:20:36 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Rossi claims that the nickel will have to be changed out periodically, every
six months or so. I doubt it.
If 50 cc is filled with Ni powder, and the density is half that of the solid
metal, then there is enough
This cartoon says it all, no?
However, one contrarian slant on Jed's comment about particle detection, is
that this may not be a net positive . although yes, it would literally
crush skepticism. For that we would all be grateful.
OTOH - we keep getting back to the problem of NRC approval,
Jones sez:
...
OTOH - we keep getting back to the problem of NRC approval,
or even UL approval. With proved particle detection and
real fusion, then we are back to being years away from
having the device approved in the USA.
Adding more to the goose chase, let us not forget the fact that
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:48 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding more to the goose chase, let us not forget the fact that there
are those who would like to denigrate the word fusion, and replace
it with what they believe is a more accurate term: nuclear
I assume the Rossi device is producing cold fusion, the same as the Pd-D
systems. Call it what you will, it is what it is. If it produces
radioactive byproducts such as tritium, that fact will soon be known. I
expect many laboratories will soon look closely and learn more about it
than we have
On 04/25/2011 02:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
... Big oil, big coal, nuclear power, wind power and other vested
interests will wage all-out political war, saturating members of
congress
The opposition may win this political battle. Cold fusion may never be
allowed.
There are something
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
The opposition may win this political battle. Cold fusion may never be
allowed.
. . .
Big Oil's lobbyists could conceivably render the United States
irrelevant to the world's energy future, but that's about it.
Yes. Right. I should not have said never be
*Large international oil companies have little power over the oil producing
nation states that they depend upon. They would like nothing better then to
divorce their business plan away from OPEC.*
* *
*When a country gets it in their mind to get off oil, it can happen.
Brazil’s ethanol industry
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*With the exception of the natural gas industry and the centralized
electric industry, all cold fusion obstructive forces are unpopular, weak
and can be overcome.*
I think you are right. I hope you are right!
Still, I expect severe opposition, especially
minor glitches, there
will be no stopping further development.
-Mark
_
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 5:17 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Comic gets it right
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
With the exception
...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 25, 2011 9:18:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Comic gets it right
Have to disagree with Jed's conclusions as to the extreme level of opposition
that this will face...
I don't think there is any situation in the history of modern economics that
can
compare
Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Have to disagree with Jed's conclusions as to the extreme level of
opposition that this will face...
Those are not conclusions so much as worst case scenarios. I think we should
be prepared for a continuation of what we have seen for the past 22
Fiction -- Reality vs Perception
-Mark
_
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 7:42 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Comic gets it right
Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Have to disagree with Jed's conclusions
19 matches
Mail list logo
