Oops typo: should have been over 100 hours
- Original Message -
From: Andrew andrew...@att.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:14 AM
Subject: [Vo]:E-Cat general observations
My very first post here, so be gentle. By way of introduction, I was on
Usenet back in
From: Andrew andrew...@att.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:14:14 AM
My very first post here, so be gentle.
Yeah ... sre ...
3. You'll notice that the plot for Plutonium has the axes
erroneously swapped.
It's been fixed in the article. Also the Power density for Plutonium
From pictures in the Levi's report, the wires are not galvanic shielded
between the eCat and the controller. Thus frequency of the waveform (if any)
is low. And the waveform should be easily determined by a simple
oscilloscope.
2. I don't have a problem with this verification being done at
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
That was the motivation behind the hot-cat : the current operating
temperature of around 300C is likely a good fit with the Siemens turbine
they are purportedly experimenting with.
The pressurized water in a conventional fission reactor is about 320°C I
, a
reactor has a meltdown.
_
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: mardi 21 mai 2013 21:15
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat general observations
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
That was the motivation behind the hot-cat : the current
[mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* mardi 21 mai 2013 21:15
*To:* **vortex-l@eskimo.com**
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:E-Cat general observations
** **
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
That was the motivation behind the hot-cat : the current operating
temperature of around 300C
6 matches
Mail list logo
