Re: [Vo]:FYI: too many taus for Standard Model...

2012-09-14 Thread Terry Blanton
S.R. Hadden: First rule in government spending: why build one when you can have two at twice the price?

Re: [Vo]:FYI: too many taus for Standard Model...

2012-09-14 Thread Daniel Rocha
t > not that likely to pay off… > > ** ** > > -Mark > > ** ** > > *From:* Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:49 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:FYI: too many taus for Standard Model... > > **

RE: [Vo]:FYI: too many taus for Standard Model...

2012-09-14 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
. Putting all your eggs in one or two baskets is just not that likely to pay off. -Mark From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:49 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: too many taus for Standard Model... Well, they do

Re: [Vo]:FYI: too many taus for Standard Model...

2012-09-13 Thread Daniel Rocha
Well, they do not have a significance to claim to justify that SM is incorrect. Besides, they are talking about decay rates of mesons, which are bound states of mesons, meaning strong force interaction which is very prone to errors in theoretical rate calculations. In the case of a growing divergen