Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion?

Robert Leguillon wrote: Someone claiming to be Hank Mills chimed in on Rossi's JoNP webpage with: > > . . . I think we should be skeptical of the claims of any company that > claims to have robust Ni-H systems, but do not utilize catalysts. > Mills is confused. Defkalion says they do utilize

RE: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion?

Jones: Pages 1 and 2 (Project Summary) are missing from that PDF... -Mark _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 8:46 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion? Apparently

RE: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion?

Apparently - in claiming that no one else has shown "robust and powerful Ni-H systems" this Mills (not Randell) is unaware of what Thermacore was doing in the early nineties, ahead of Piantelli (and 50 times more robust). Unlike Rossi - the R&D results in the paper below was verified independently.

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion?

Everyone know it was Ron Paul that went to Mars, damn it! 2012/1/6 Mary Yugo > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> That's really Hank Mills. He always posts there. >> > > > Hank Mills writes favorably and enthusiastically about every impossible, > incompetent or fraudule

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion?

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > That's really Hank Mills. He always posts there. > Hank Mills writes favorably and enthusiastically about every impossible, incompetent or fraudulent free energy claim he can get his hands on and the web site on which he writes publicized a

Re: [Vo]:Hank Mills Weighs in on Defkalion?

That's really Hank Mills. He always posts there. 2012/1/6 Robert Leguillon > Someone claiming to be Hank Mills chimed in on Rossi's JoNP webpage with: > > __ > *Hank Mills* > January 5th, 2012 at 11:48 > PM