I've understood they mean: you can measure gamma as you wan't, no
limitation (unlike rossi's)
2012/1/25 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
> From Alian:
>
> > note that for defkalion,
> > gamma measures is not a secret
> > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5615#p5615
>
> I read th
wrong hole.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson [mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:56 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LEAD shielding - a dual purpose?
Good comments from everyone.
>From Alian:
> note that for defkalion,
> gamma measures is not a secret
> http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5615#p5615
I read the thread. The only commentary from DGT is:
No, there is not any such limitation
Thank you
??? Ooooh-Kay... What does that mean?
note that for defkalion,
gamma measures is not a secret
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5615#p5615
2012/1/25 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
> What kind of radiation is emitted from Rossi's eCats remains a
> frustrating trade-secret.
Unfortunately this model is nowhere near adequate to be able to
calculate the levels of gamma we might see. At this stage it is at best
a qualitative model that might explain the general characteristics. If
the match looked sufficiently good to be worth looking at further then
no doubt the mo
Good comments from everyone.
>From Axel:
> In the context of the new high temperature NiH reactor
> designs, lead will melt at a lower temperature (327C)
> as compared to the temperature of the high temperature
> coolant (349C), therefore the theory of heat production
> in lead is untenable.
I a
The 'fact' that the gamma only appears as a burst during startup is one
peice of 'evidence' that I think suggests that the mechanism relies on a
coherent state within the nickel, probably an optical vibrational mode
within the lattice.
Once it is at a sufficient amplitide, it's existence might
In the context of the new high temperature NiH reactor designs, lead will
melt at a lower temperature (327C) as compared to the temperature of the
high temperature coolant (349C), therefore the theory of heat production in
lead is untenable.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:41 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V
for defkalion réactors, knowing their testing measures, it is clear that no
noticeable gamma is produced,
and that (hopefuly) classic gamma are not the main production of energy.
it is not far from the same with rossi's reactor, when you see the
relatively thin lead protection...
from what I've r
On 25/01/12 15:41, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Somewhere in a recent collection of Vort posts was a thread or two
touching on speculation (evidence?) that the source of the massive
amount of exothermic heat generated from Rossi's eCats is actually due
to gamma radiation being emitted f
10 matches
Mail list logo
