I would like to see a grants and target institution targeted to answer your
questions. Also it is good to remember that the standard model was fitted
to high energy
particle data, typically advanced theories degenerates at limits to a
limited set of possible solutions, the standard model QED etc co
I would like to see Mills rewrite the dirac equations for the electron to
reflect his hydrino theory. This includes the experimental verification of
a fractionally charged positron. There should be gamma rays produced to
account for hydrino anti-hydrino annihilation. How does the anti-hydrino
inter
Orionworks,
Yes experiments is all good, i'm more concerned why we don't get any
replication / debunks and from more independent sources. Is'n there
enough to verify the evidences? Also what if it's too difficult to create
hydrinos, and Mills theory would be better suited to explain for example
co
So you demand that all science is explained or you would not accept a
theory. Is that fair, wouldn't it be prudent to accept that Mills is spot
on in so many theoretical question, where it outperforms what we do in
quantum mechanics, that we simple must put scientific effort into
explaining the wor
Stefan,
Please correct me if I am mistaken but I assume you are the same "stefan" who
has posted similar complaints out at the SCP discussion group.
As has frequently been stated out in the Vort Collective...
Experimental evidence always trumps theory.
I must confess the fact that
The existence of hydrinos are open to conjecture, but I am concerned with
the question of their place in the ordering of things; are they fundamental
or emergent, and how are they related to the other fractional bits of
matter and energy that might be more basic in their nature?
When the fractiona
6 matches
Mail list logo
