That people conspired together to steal the IP / trade secrets says it
is not prior knowledge.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:33 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Technically, Rossi still has to prove the I part of the IP, besides,
he must show that it is not based on prior art from Piantelli.
2011/11/29
/snip/
Did he ever say entire factory or just heat a factory? :) Or was only his
room? Seeing his old tests to McKubre, it should be something below 400W, if
that was the state of the art back then.
/snip/
In his patent application, he states:
[0060] A practical embodiment of the inventive
He didn't say how much that was heated! But it's weird that he mentions
that. It's like he is inviting the patent analyzers to test his device, LOL!
2011/11/29 Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
/snip/
Did he ever say entire factory or just heat a factory? :) Or was only
his room?
I think the only device that did not somehow impress the people who
attended demonstrations, according to these, was the one shown to Krivit.
2011/11/29 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
2011/11/29 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
He didn't say how much that was heated! But it's weird that he
2011/11/29 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com:
I think the only device that did not somehow impress the people who attended
demonstrations, according to these, was the one shown to Krivit.
Maybe it was Rossi who set up Krivit knowing that he supported
Piantelli and that Krivit would ultimately
5 matches
Mail list logo