Bob, that’s an interesting theory.. wasn’t over abundant copper one of the
anomalous Rossi claims?
Fran
From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:51 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
If you believe slide 13 of the AP report, there was very little Zn in the
> fuel to start with and even less after reaction. Ni amounted to 60 weight
> % to start and Zn was reported to be .0135 %. There was not much Zn-64 in
> any case.
>
I'v
I think we all agree that more information is needed, and that both 64Zn and
64Ni are unlikely to be seen in such large percentage – especially without the
author of the paper taking notice. Resolution of this mystery depends on more
information. The fact that the other data is spot-on refutes t
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
My comment is only addressing the issue of whether Zn-64 was mistaken for
> Ni-64 which Jones raised a couple days back.
>
Your point about the amount of zinc in the ICP-MS analysis on slide 13 was
an interesting one. I was hoping to show that th
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
I think we all agree that more information is needed, and that both 64Zn
> and 64Ni are unlikely to be seen in such large percentage – especially
> without the author of the paper taking notice. Resolution of this mystery
> depends on more infor
speculate on.
- Mark Jurich
From: Eric Walker <mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 1:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
I think
Here's a piccy of the label:
http://tinypic.com?ref=b7bc5k"; target="_blank">http://i66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.png"; border="0" alt="Image and video hosting
by TinyPic">
That was confusing. Try this:
http://tinypic.com/r/b7bc5k/9
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Here's a piccy of the label:
>
> http://tinypic.com?ref=b7bc5k"; target="_blank">http://i66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.png"; border="0" alt="Image and video
> hosting by TinyPic">
>
>
>
Okay, without the noise:
http://oi66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.jpg
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> That was confusing. Try this:
>
> http://tinypic.com/r/b7bc5k/9
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> Here's a piccy of the label:
>>
>> http://tinypi
Don't know if this will come through, but it is small... Here is the image
of the label unwrapped from the jar:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Okay, without the noise:
>
> http://oi66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.jpg
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
The only details that I can surmise from this label is that it probably came
from “Ruskhim” which from the web is/was a seller of reagents, chemical, raw
materials and lab gear … and that the sales date was 1990. And at least the
seller considered it to be 99.90 % nickel.
This means essentia
From: Bob Cook
I doubt that the mass spec readings would have had such a peak at 64 given the
low concentration of Zn reported.
That’s because the zinc was labeled as nickel. Both the charts on page 14 and
15 show the enrichment of 64Ni at 4.4% -- but now Parkhomov explains that what
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
I do not think there was any report of very much Zn in the fuel. If there
> was Zn-64 in the samples tested it was not apparent from the report. In
> fact as I noted yesterday, Zn was on the order of 01 percent. It was not
> anyway reported nea
Quote from Miley on Zinc posted on my web page Zero Point Technologies.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/wright.html
Bob,
If a particular test or type of analysis is sampling the surface, but is done
in such a way that a natural mechanism can bring mobile elements from deep
inside a structure up to the surface, then the more volatile components could
appear to have much higher concentration than they should.
Hi Bob,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
If I am not wrong, the laser activation indicates Zn is 0.004 mass % vs
> the suggested 4%—more than an order of magnitude LOW!—more like 3 orders
> Low! I checked the table of mass % and it adds to 100 percent.
>
You're comparing appl
Bob - I’m simply trying to present options at this point. It is impossible to
draw any valid conclusions since the data is conflicting.
Zinc would be less compelling as a reactant if it were not a Mills catalyst
with the lowest Rydberg “hole” in addition to its volatility. Thus it can **do
The recent realization that zinc fits the role as an ideal vapor-phase catalyst
for hydrogen densification should be emphasized, so bear with me until the
point is fully belabored. J
This is about using zinc with nickel as a catalyst in the context of a hot
reactor like the Parkhomov Sochi e
Jones,
While all of this Zn speculation is an interesting theory/hypothesis, it
stemmed from a completely improbable hypothesis - that the 4.4% of measured
64Ni was due to contamination by Zn in Parkhomov's Sochi analyses.
First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would
Hi Bob,
Again, “how the zinc got there” is probably an unsolvable mystery, but
contamination can come from unexpected places. It may still amount to
serendipity.
Recently an acute observer of the details of this situation has mentioned to me
off-list that Parkhomov added zinc oxide to his ceme
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would
> have a natural isotopic ratio. The natural abundance for 64Ni is 0.9%.
> So, for the reported 4.4% of m=64 to be 64Zn + natural 64Ni, there would
> have to be a 64Zn co
Notice that the amount of 58Ni increased by 1% and the amount of 60Ni
increased by 0.8%.
In total this equals the 1.8% decrease in the amount of 64Ni.
Harry
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bob Higgins
> wrote:
>
>> First of all, it is reas
I wrote:
> Notice that the amount of 58Ni increased by 1% and the amount of 60Ni
> increased by 0.8%.
> In total this equals the 1.8% decrease in the amount of 64Ni.
I was refering to slide 14 in this link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2cHBha0RLbUo5ZVU/view?pref=2&pli=1
Harry
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:31 PM, H LV wrote:
I wrote:
>
> > Notice that the amount of 58Ni increased by 1% and the amount of 60Ni
> > increased by 0.8%.
> > In total this equals the 1.8% decrease in the amount of 64Ni.
>
> I was refering to slide 14 in this link:
>
That brings up a related poin
See below ...
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bob Higgins
> wrote:
>
> First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would
>> have a natural isotopic ratio. The natural abundance for 64Ni is 0.9%.
>> So, for the repor
Bob,
You seem to be hung up on the impossibility of 7% zinc contamination and OK -
you are probably correct on that point, as far as it goes… BUT… consider this.
Zinc has a surprisingly low boiling point of 907C and the typical glow-tube
reactor does not produce excess heat unless it get
Jones, I agree that there are many tantalizing characteristics of Zn as a
possible catalyst material.
My point is only that based on other measurements of AP's fuel, it is not
plausible that 64Zn can be responsible for for the high ICP-MS reading for
64Ni in his Sochi reported analyses.
This also
From: Bob Higgins
Jones, I agree that there are many tantalizing characteristics of Zn as a
possible catalyst material….My point is only that based on other measurements
of AP's fuel, it is not plausible that 64Zn can be responsible for for the high
ICP-MS reading for 64Ni in his Sochi reporte
Bob Higgins--
I agree with your conclusion regarding rhe absence of significant Zn in AP’S
fuel. The laser activation results indicate this clearly IMHO as previously
noted.
Bob Cook
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 10:59
29 matches
Mail list logo
