Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-03 Thread Terry Blanton
You might find this excerpt from his message header interesting: Authentication-Results: smtp02.embarq.synacor.com smtp.user=drstiff...@embarqmail.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Message-ID: 49ac4d8d.1000...@embarqmail.com Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:20:13 -0600 From: J. Klum jk...@embarqmail.com

Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-03 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Terry Blanton wrote: You might find this excerpt from his message header interesting: Authentication-Results: smtp02.embarq.synacor.com smtp.user=drstiff...@embarqmail.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Message-ID: 49ac4d8d.1000...@embarqmail.com Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:20:13 -0600 From: J. Klum

RE: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-03 Thread Rick Monteverde
Thomas - What planet are you living on Jed? Did you hear the news? Pakistan (100 nukes) is being over run by Al Queda, Iran has enough material to build one, and they just launched a satellite. Well, at least Obama's not really a socialist, it's just opportunistic political opponents telling

Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
J. Klum wrote: Vortex mired down in political involvements . . . Just temporarily. We are, after all, living through some of the most dramatic consequential political and economic events of the last 60 years. If this was October 1962 (the Cuban Missile Crisis) we would be obsessing about

Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-02 Thread J. Klum
Jed Rothwell wrote: J. Klum wrote: Vortex mired down in political involvements . . . Just temporarily. We are, after all, living through some of the most dramatic consequential political and economic events of the last 60 years. If this was October 1962 (the Cuban Missile Crisis) we

Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-02 Thread mixent
In reply to J. Klum's message of Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:12:23 -0600: Hi, [snip] Vortex mired down in political involvements seems to be missing the fact that progress is being made in the world of electrolysis by replications of a persons work that was drummed out of the vortex realm. I must

Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-02 Thread Jones Beene
When you say zero current - how was this measured? The SEC does draw current, even if it is in the few milliamp range. Also why would you say that AC electrolysis does not evolve gas from both electrodes? It does. Dr Andrija Puharich was doing this nearly 30 years ago...

Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-02 Thread J. Klum
Jones Beene wrote: When you say "zero current" - how was this measured? The SEC does draw current, even if it is in the few milliamp range. Also why would you say that AC electrolysis does not evolve gas from both electrodes? It does. Dr Andrija Puharich was doing this nearly

Re: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-02 Thread thomas malloy
Jed Rothwell wrote: J. Klum wrote: Vortex mired down in political involvements . . . Nuclear war seems a lot less likely now than it used to, which tells that things don't always go to hell in a handbasket, and people are not always as bad as they can be. That is worth remembering in a

RE: [Vo]:Replications of zero current electrolysis

2009-03-02 Thread Mark Iverson
Mr. Klum wrote: ... when provisional patents were discontinued some 13 months prior? I'm not sure since english is probably not your native language, but are you saying that provisional patents are no longer accepted by the Patent Office? In the U.S., they sure as hell are... after doing