Re: [Vo]:The LENR triad and zinc volatility

2016-03-30 Thread mixent
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:18:31 -0500: Hi, [snip] >It is possible that a suitable environment could stimulate electron capture >without leading to competing positron emission, e.g., through a surplus of >electrons passing through the nucleus. [snip] I don't think dou

Re: [Vo]:The LENR triad and zinc volatility

2016-03-29 Thread Eric Walker
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Jones Beene wrote: If there is a nuclear decay reaction responsible for the thermal anomaly, > then 64Cu is the “swing element” in the triad - and has a half-life of > about 12 hours. It can beta decay by positron emission to 64Ni, or more > often by negative beta

RE: [Vo]:The LENR triad and zinc volatility

2016-03-29 Thread Roarty, Francis X
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160324154016.htm something about the use of a gel to form a uniform powder in most reactive form might be applicable to LENR triad as well? Fran From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:07 AM To: vortex-l@eskim