that is what I have in mind too.
I am quite conservative (sic) about conservation laws.
The more i heard of them, the more I think they are structurally solid
(anyway I may be wrong), because they are expression of symmetries.
It seems TD2 is linked to Heizenberg, and TD1 to gauge equivalence.
any
On Jan 4, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
The theorist is always looking for experimental results to confirm
his reality. That is a situation that is pleasing and conformable.
But when the experiment confronts the theorist with the unexpected
and the disturbing, the theorist must adjus
The theorist is always looking for experimental results to confirm his
reality. That is a situation that is pleasing and conformable.
But when the experiment confronts the theorist with the unexpected and the
disturbing, the theorist must adjust his reality to match what is real.
Quantum mech
This is good - but those of us who follow the field closely should be aware
that LENR advocates and practitioners can themselves be blindly skeptical
within the niche, such as when confronted with an explanation or theory
which they do not espouse, or an experimenter who has been rude to them
(i.e.
Alain, the phenomenon of LENR itself does not violate the laws of
thermodynamics but some of the explanations do. Apparently, this is a
problem that physicists have. Many of them do not understand or accept
the laws of thermodynamics. Consequently, they waste a lot of time
discussing ideas
that some people said LENR claims do violate laws of thermodynamic made me
fall on my bottom...
it remind me the book of Beaudette about what he call skeptic (in fact
deniers)
page 134 (164) in the box:
summation
*Characteristics of the Scientific Skeptic*
In general, skeptics display the followi
Jed,
I think the phrase "low-energy nuclear reactions" must have been inspired
by current claims. On p.5, under the "PROGRAM OVERVIEW", it states -
"This announcement is purposely broad in scope to encourage the
submission of the most innovative, out-of-the-box ideas in energy
technology. S
It is a little hard to find the actual reference. It says "low-energy
nuclear reactions" on page 7, Figure 3, item 3.6.
Here is the URL for the full document -
>
> ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY – ENERGY (ARPA-E)
> U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
> OPEN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN ENERGY-RELATED APPLIE
Happby delayed B'Day Terry,
Don't let your cat's mistake one of your peg legs for a scratching post. ;-)
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
Here is the URL for the full document -
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY ENERGY (ARPA-E)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
OPEN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN ENERGY-RELATED APPLIED SCIENCE (OPEN IDEAS)
Announcement Type: Initial Announcement
Funding Opportunity No. DE-FOA-0001002
CFDA Number 81.135
http:/
>
> *New Energy Times has just learned that, on Sept. 27, 2013, the Department
> of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) quietly
> announced a funding opportunity for low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR)
> research, among other areas.*
Hey, that was my 59th birthday. How nice
11 matches
Mail list logo