In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:26:35 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
I should add that x-rays resulting from these electrons could easily lie in this
range.
>In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011
>16:30:59 -0500:
>Hi,
>[snip]
>>From Mark:
>>
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011
16:30:59 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>From Mark:
>
>> Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true,
>> but the day after the stop of the operation. In any case you are right, if
>> 59-Cu is formed from 58-Ni
>From Mark:
> Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true,
> but the day after the stop of the operation. In any case you are right, if
> 59-Cu is formed from 58-Ni we should have the couples of 511 keV at 180° and
> we never found them, while we found keV in the rang
Jed:
Add that he has seen energetic particle emissions in the 100keV to 300keV
range...
I put this in a posting a few days ago and no one even noticed!
This from a Ny Teknik Q&A session with Rossi...
Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true, but
the day after t
4 matches
Mail list logo