On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> This theory has no bearing on the results. The theory may be wrong, but
> the technique has been independently tested, and it works.
>
So they claim. But the demonstrations are not impressive. I'm not aware of
any peer-reviewed papers on i
vapor is ~1800.
-m
From: Robert Leguillon [mailto:robert.leguil...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 10:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?
Just a thought, FWIW:
The pressure does increase, raising the boiling temperature, decreasing the
Mary Yugo wrote:
This sort of claim "Unique to the ET experiments is the use of a new
> understanding of wave modulation. Rather than dc, dc + ac, dc pulsed or
> bi-level perturbation, the waveforms being subjected (successfully) to test
> by ET employ waves fractally nested in a specific non-lin
Subject: RE: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:29:17 -0800
Mass in must = mass out, or else pressure inside would steadily increase… From:
Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:19 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo
Mass in must = mass out, or else pressure inside would steadily increase.
From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:19 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?
I never found a way to make vapor carry more than
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
> There are scientists that report much better results:
> http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
> citation:
> - Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours with a total
> excess energy of 4.6 Megajoules
>
I never found a way to make vapor carry more than 1/1 of its volume in
liquid when any of its parts are sltighly off horizontal. So, I cannot
convince myself that humidity meters would be useful at all.
2011/12/11 Mary Yugo
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>> Are
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Are you sure Puthoff was so skeptical to start with? He spent more than a
> decade spending public money to research paranormal even before meeting
> Yuri Geller.
>
Neither Targ nor Puthoff were properly skeptical of Geller's ridiculous
(and
Are you sure Puthoff was so skeptical to start with? He spent more than a
decade spending public money to research paranormal even before meeting
Yuri Geller.
2011/12/11 Mary Yugo
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat <
> aussieguy.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you saying Lev
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
wrote:
> Are you saying Levi, Celani, Kullander, Essen,Bianchi, McKubre,Focardi,
> etc and Rossi are ALL fools, idiots, liars or incompetents? If you throw
> mud at Rossi you throw mud at them as well.
>
No. You're putting up a straw man. The pe
Are you saying Levi, Celani, Kullander, Essen,Bianchi, McKubre,Focardi,
etc and Rossi are ALL fools, idiots, liars or incompetents? If you throw
mud at Rossi you throw mud at them as well.
As for our venture, we need to wait for Rossi to post the technical
specification for the high temperatur
Vorl Bek wrote:
>
> If you are so sure Rossi has the goods, why don't you pay him the
> money now - none of that escrow nonsense - in return for a 10
> percent discount, or for putting you at the top of the waiting
> list - or both?
>
Did Rossi make those offers? Are you negotiating with him?
W
Peter Heckert wrote:
There are scientists that report much better results:
> http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
> citation:
> - Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours with a total
> excess energy of 4.6 Megajoules
>
Dardik's results are impressive,
> The circus is the continual refusal by deniers that call over 1
> year of published peer reviewed (Levi, Kullander, Celani, etc)
> test data rubbish when it is the deniers that are making up
> rubbish claims. You want science? Wait until Rossi sells me a
> E-Cat and you can give it your all, tha
What circus? Rossi brought a Door Knob and stove pipe style reactor to
the university for testing. Set it up with their test equipment and
advise. Did the test the way they desired, as the university people were
in the room (like Celani who tried to get / steal a spectrum) and
measured around 1
I think more his +10 kW outputs with a few 100 watts in is hard to
question and that is which causes the stares and envy. As for
questionable methods, the 15 Jan test was done under the supervision of
the university professors and scientists. As Rossi said in the video, we
did the tests as they
> There are scientists that report much better results:
> http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/204israel.html
> citation:
> - Run #64b gave 1500% excess heat over a duration of 80 hours
> with a total excess energy of 4.6 Megajoules
>
> So, why do they all stare at Rossi and his poor COP a
Why? Because Rossi has apparently cracked the reliability issue. I can
tell you he is being super conservative about the COP number. The 1 MW
test had virtually NO input power. close to infinite COP, 5.5 hours of
heat after death until finally the customer's acceptance engineer said
"I have see
18 matches
Mail list logo
