Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-22 Thread mixent
In reply to Chris Zell's message of Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:02:36 -0700 (PDT): Hi, [snip] >Lemme get this straight, you wanna build fusion reactors to make gasoline? >  >OK,  so economic development isn't always linear.  Maybe if you reduce energy >inputs to nearly zero cost,  the other costs of labo

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:36 PM, wrote > I was going to use that! :( The early bird gets the worm; but, the second mouse gets the cheese. :-) Terry

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-16 Thread Chris Zell
Lemme get this straight, you wanna build fusion reactors to make gasoline?   OK,  so economic development isn't always linear.  Maybe if you reduce energy inputs to nearly zero cost,  the other costs of labor and equipment still give you cheap gasoline.   But first the minor hurdle of achieving

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-16 Thread mixent
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:27:52 -0500: Hi, [snip] >On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Chris Zell wrote: >> "we will shortly conquer fusion" >> >> Next question is, what do you do with it, once conquered?  How do you make >> energy portable or put fusion in a car? Th

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-16 Thread mixent
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:40:46 -0400: Hi, [snip] > > >- Original Message - >From: mix...@bigpond.com >Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:17 am >Subject: Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear > >> >&g

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-16 Thread Harry Veeder
- Original Message - From: mix...@bigpond.com Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:17 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear > > The difference between us is that I believe we will shortly conquer > fusion,making it available as an energy source.

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Chris Zell wrote: > "we will shortly conquer fusion" > > Next question is, what do you do with it, once conquered?  How do you make > energy portable or put fusion in a car? Mr. Fusion? http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/photos/2070049523_385bca185b_o.jpg Terr

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-16 Thread Chris Zell
"we will shortly conquer fusion"   Next question is, what do you do with it, once conquered?  How do you make energy portable or put fusion in a car?

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-15 Thread mixent
igpond.com] >Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 7:03 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear > >In reply to Lawrence de Bivort's message of Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:16:47 >-0400: >Hi, >[snip] >>Someday, I imagine, hum

RE: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-14 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear I wrote: "It is notable that we *can* make feed stocks from CO2 using algae and sunlight: http://www.oilgae.com/ Unfortunately, most of the CO2 producing plants are in the north. One solution might be to pipeline CO2 south. Probably more sens

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-14 Thread Horace Heffner
I wrote: "It is notable that we *can* make feed stocks from CO2 using algae and sunlight: http://www.oilgae.com/ Unfortunately, most of the CO2 producing plants are in the north. One solution might be to pipeline CO2 south. Probably more sensible to build new hybrid plants in the south

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-14 Thread OrionWorks
From: Lawrence de Bivort > Hi, Robin, > > Agreed that carbons can be used to make carbon compounds. But, as > you point out, there is non-trivial the matter of energy consumed > in the process and, I would add, the non-trivial matter of > economics. > > There is a reason we aren't making carbon-ba

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-14 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jun 14, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Lawrence de Bivort wrote: Hi, Robin, Agreed that carbons can be used to make carbon compounds. But, as you point out, there is non-trivial the matter of energy consumed in the process and, I would add, the non-trivial matter of economics. There is a reason w

RE: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-14 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
same reason is the reason why we should be conserving oil for feedstock purposes, rather than fuel. No? Lawrence -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 7:03 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs m

Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-13 Thread mixent
In reply to Lawrence de Bivort's message of Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:16:47 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Someday, I imagine, humankind will rue having burned oil for fuel, realizing >that it was far more valuable as material feedstock for plastics than it is >as fuel. It may be our children who come to realize th

RE: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right -- oil and nuclear

2009-06-12 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
Someday, I imagine, humankind will rue having burned oil for fuel, realizing that it was far more valuable as material feedstock for plastics than it is as fuel. It may be our children who come to realize this, and they may wonder why their parents and grandparents didn't realize it and why they di