>
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:33 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
>
>>
>> Here's my best shot at the moment:
>> http://maurol.com.ar/decay_rates/halflife_bnl+Rx.jpg
>>
>> I've superposed the graphs. The red line is 1/Sun-Earth
>> distance^2-1 (distance is now in au, and scaled up vertically), and
>> the green lin
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:33 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Here's my best shot at the moment:
http://maurol.com.ar/decay_rates/halflife_bnl+Rx.jpg
I've superposed the graphs. The red line is 1/Sun-Earth
distance^2-1 (distance is now in au, and scaled up vertically), and
the green line is the -x compo
Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've plotted the different vectorial components of the velocity
>> vector, and distance to the Sun on the same graph, and curiously
>> enough, the "y component" of the velocity vector (and probably of the
>> dista
On Sep 24, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Hi,
I've plotted the different vectorial components of the velocity
vector, and distance to the Sun on the same graph, and curiously
enough, the "y component" of the velocity vector (and probably of
the distance vector, although I've not plo
Mauro Lacy wrote:
> Mauro Lacy wrote:
>
>>> Jack Smith wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I would note ... that the phase seems slightly off from
>>> sun's distance. So we can say there is an annual cycle,
>>> but it might be cosmic rays, gravitational potential or
>>> perhaps temperature or other environmental
Mauro Lacy wrote:
>> Jack Smith wrote:
>> ...
>> I would note ... that the phase seems slightly off from
>> sun's distance. So we can say there is an annual cycle,
>> but it might be cosmic rays, gravitational potential or
>> perhaps temperature or other environmental variable.
>>
>
> velocity
nd familiar either?
Just a thought -JO-
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:50:32 -0300
> From: ma...@lacy.com.ar
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Writing another paper. the duality of matter and waves
>
> Hi Frank
>
> Something along those lines. Your derivation of
>
> Jack Smith wrote:
> ...
> I would note ... that the phase seems slightly off from
> sun's distance. So we can say there is an annual cycle,
> but it might be cosmic rays, gravitational potential or
> perhaps temperature or other environmental variable.
velocity? If I'm not mistaken, velocity i
Hi Frank
Something along those lines. Your derivation of the elastic nature of
the electron is a little bit confusing, but I think is the way to go.
I suggest you to abandon the "particle paradigm" completely, and
concentrate on the "extended wave paradigm", i.e. pulsating strings,
that is, elast
9 matches
Mail list logo
