Scott,
                OK its clear to me that You absolutely get it! But I was trying 
to avoid the confusion when talking about "velocity" on a nonphysical axis - 
the seeming conflicts and arguments I got early on  caused me to write the 
thread in the verbose manner that I chose for the benefit of those less 
familiar. Once the lights come on and someone understands the relativistic  
concept of a shrinking time axis it does make an easier model to visualize. 
Your reference to the  reverse Relativistic Twins analogy where the cavity twin 
corresponds to the less accelerated twin on earth was spot on because the 
cavity twin is negatively accelerated (equivalently)such that the "stationary 
twin" outside the cavity appears to be approaching luminal velocity relative to 
the negatively accelerated cavity twin inside. My biggest challenge here is to 
develop a mathematical relationship between the Casimir formula  and  energy 
density that would allow an equivalent acceleration suitable to accumulate into 
this new form of "equivalent" Lorentzian contraction. Some of the life after 
death scenarios suggest a very slow accumulation to this contraction point 
where the scale can then start to contract rapidly and produce these anomalous 
forms of mini hydrogen. If I am correct about this rapid form of contraction 
then these atoms are able to penetrate down into cavities hundreds of times 
smaller than the "spatial" size of the atoms themselves. The relativistic space 
time inside these cavities does have the Limits imposed by Liftshitz for how 
close these atoms can approach the plates generating the field but in this 
scenario that limit is never violated as the atoms continually shrink away from 
the walls of the cavitiy  allowing more and more gas to occupy the same spatial 
volume without increasing pressure.
Regards
Fran

From: Wm. Scott Smith [mailto:scott...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 6:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Relativistic-Cavity Twins

Shrinking the time axis is the same thing as augmenting the spacial axes if we 
are defining distance as Velocity multiplied by time.  Shrinking the time axis 
means that more local time is traversed, requiring more distance.  This is the 
reverse of the Relativistic Twins: In this instance, the cavity "Twin" 
corresponds to the one that stays on Earth and vice versa!
________________________________
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:01:56 -0500
From: francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Rel Cav's: Shrink time axis inside Relativistic 
Cavities to get correct result!
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Scott,
                I like your model for the temporal aspect but I was choosing my 
words carefully to make my points as  intelligible as possible to the most 
common denominator. I was also trying to make the point that there can be a 
larger volume of space  inside the cavity then the exterior spatial dimensions 
would predict. IMHO Deuterium ice, condensed hydrogen and the myriad  other 
names we apply are all unchanged locally but take on these strange appearances 
when they occupy this extended space inside a Casimir cavity or the 
interstitial space inside a lattice.  I believe that when   vacuum fluctuations 
 "appear" to get smaller between Casimir plates it is NOT a  simple 
displacement of the longer flux being replaced by shorter flux that can fit 
between the plates as described in the present popular version of this theory. 
In the relativistic interpretation  it is still the same longer flux  which 
only appear shorter in a form of Lorentzian contraction. I believe that this 
type of contraction reflects direct changes to the time axis where space time 
itself is reshaped inside the cavity. Unlike the normal Lorentzian contraction 
of a single dimension where you have spatial velocity in a Pythagorean 
relationship to the "normal" intersecting rate of the ether, this version of 
contraction instead directly changes the intersection rate of this nonphysical 
axis by manipulating energy density. Because the axis of 
displacement/contraction is now 90 degrees to all 3 spatial axis this type of 
contraction should appear  spatially symmetrical and appear to get smaller from 
ANY spatial axis instead of the common Lorentzian contraction. The cost of this 
type of contraction is borne by nature in segregating energy density between 
the outside and inside of a plate cavity system in a manner that skips the need 
for near luminal velocity and instead changes time (intersecting rate) directly 
proportional to local geometry in different zones inside and outside the cavity.
Regards
Fran

Wm. Scott Smith said on Thursday , January 27, 2011 1:13 PM
I really think a better way to think about Relativistic Cavities is to think of 
the time-axis shrinking, relative to the also reduced size of they particle 
within the cavity.  Shrinking the time axis, has the effect of accelerating the 
velocity of travel along that axis, ie the passage of time.  This approach 
explains precisely how the H2 molecule "spends so much time there relative to 
us and spends so little time there from an external perspective.
________________________________

Reply via email to