Most was just rehash but the link to  his article on quantum flux induced 
gravity I will have to follow up on and see if we agree regarding my model of 
the flux intersection rate being opposed by the nucleus and stretching space 
time into tiny relativistic wells where electron orbitals chase forever but 
never catch up - it is a sort of inverse way to accomplish the Puthoff atomic 
model where the energy is instead restored via pushing the nuclus further away 
which still restores the ground state after spontaneous emission. [snip] "The 
first hint that these phenomena might themselves be traceable to roots in the 
underlying fluctuations of the vacuum came in a study published by the 
well-known Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov. Searching to derive Einstein's 
phenomenological equations for general relativity from a more fundamental set 
of assumptions, Sakharov came to the conclusion that the entire panoply of 
general relativistic phenomena could be seen as induced effects brought about 
by changes  in the quantum-fluctuation energy of the vacuum due to the presence 
of matter. In this view the attractive gravitational force is more akin to the 
induced Casimir force discussed above, than to the fundamental inverse square 
law Coulomb force between charged particles with which it is often compared. 
Although speculative when first introduced by Sakharov this hypothesis has led 
to a rich and ongoing literature, including contributions of my own on 
quantum-fluctuation-induced gravity, aliterature that continues to yield deep 
insight into the role played by vacuum forces."[/snip]

Fran




From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 7:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Relativistic-Cavity Twins

Well guys, it looks like some heavy hitters are weighing in cavity-QED:

http://weirdsciences.net/2011/01/15/can-the-vacuum-be-engineered-for-space-flight-applications-overview-of-theory-and-experiments/

Someone needs to update the Wiki entry. It is way too narrow in scope, given 
what has happened in the last several years.

Jones

Reply via email to