At 04:49 pm 18/05/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>> The secret is that the planet slowed down, just a little. You stole
>> energy from the planet. This becomes apparent when you consider
>> conservation of momentum: The spaceship's momentum vector is now
>> pointing
At 04:29 pm 18/05/2005 -0400, Stephen wrote:
>Grimer wrote:
>
>>There seems to be a strangely prevalent idea
>>that one cannot get continuous work out of a
>>gravitational field because the field is
>>"conservative" - "whatever that might mean" -
>>
>>
>Sounds like a question.
Rhetorical! 8-)
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
The secret is that the planet slowed down, just a little. You stole
energy from the planet. This becomes apparent when you consider
conservation of momentum: The spaceship's momentum vector is now
pointing in the opposite direction, so the planet must have picked u
Grimer wrote:
There seems to be a strangely prevalent idea
that one cannot get continuous work out of a
gravitational field because the field is
"conservative" - "whatever that might mean" -
Sounds like a question.
In a nutshell, a "conservative" field is one which can be expressed as
the grad
At 08:22 am 18/05/2005 -0500, John wrote:
> Not sure if it is significant or not but there is an attachment to this
> patent at the end of the images that retracts claims 26, 27, and 28. No
> reason is given. The retraction is not represented in the text only
> version
> http://patft.uspto.g
g is missing here. This is a significant body of work overall by
multiple individuals over an extended period of time. What has nothing ever
commercialized?
-john
-Original Message-
From: Grimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:52 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject:
At 01:23 pm 17/05/2005 +0100, Frank Grimer wrote:
>Thanks to the miracle of the Google search
>engine I've been able to answer my own
>request with everything on the accelerator
>that anyone would want to know [and some 8^) ]
>
>http://www.rexresearch.com/johnson/1johnson.htm
It is clear that i
At 01:50 am 1/05/2005 -0700, Frank Grimer wrote:
> This sounds like a variation of the
> SMOT ball theme.
> Does anyone know anything about it?
> Are there any patents for this Keith?
> ===
> Howard Johnson Witness Wants to See Linear
> Magnet Accelerat
8 matches
Mail list logo
