Re: Mallove obituary

2005-05-19 Thread orionworks
> From: Jed Rothwell > [it has been one year since Gene was murdered. Here > is an obituary I wrote for Infinite Energy magazine. > The family objected to it, so naturally I > acquiesced and withdrew it from publication. After > all this time I suppose > there is no harm to uploading it here. -

Re: Mallove obituary

2005-05-17 Thread Steven Krivit
Jed, I can understand why the family would decline to run your obit and think they made the right choice. As well, I am glad to see what you have written and shared publicly. It honors Gene and his search for truth. None of us is without flaws. To reflect the fullness of Gene as you did, is dee

Re: Mallove obituary

2005-05-17 Thread Terry Blanton
I came to vortex over a decade ago on a recommendation of Chris Tinsley (he *knew* I was crazy because he was a Brit). I had bought in to the "common sense" that CF was flawed. I have learned otherwise. In my heart (and elsewhere ) I named Chris, Jed and Gene the Three Musketeers of Cold Fus

RE: Mallove

2004-07-07 Thread dskjdk
Mark, -- Original Message -- From: "Mark Goldes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:22:41 -0700 >Gene and a friend were planning a visit. He had enough data and details to >convince him MPI was likely to have a commercially viable technology.

RE: Mallove

2004-07-06 Thread Mark Goldes
Had the technology been surpressed, I suspect Gene would have paralleled what he did re cold fusion. Mark From: "dskjdk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Secrecy Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:11:39 -0600 "Mark Goldes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in reply