Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-21 Thread fusion.calo...@gmail.com
 such as carbon nano tubes do not appear to work. Frank z -Original Message- From: Eric Walker To: vortex-l Sent: Sat, Apr 21, 2012 3:25 pm Subject: Re

Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-21 Thread mixent
In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:09:14 -0400 (EDT): Hi Frank, [snip] > > >Thanks all. The reciprocal units are confusing to me. We usedreciprocal >units in a solid state physics course to plot the velocity of phonons in a >solid. The plot looked like a U. Its

Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-21 Thread mixent
In reply to Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.'s message of Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:29:17 -0700: Hi, [snip] The definition of the gm was made, independent of any natural constants. It was originally intended to be the weight of a cubic centimeter of water. 1 cm = 1 meter / 100. See http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is

Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-21 Thread fznidarsic
The hydrogen must be in the mono atomic form and stripped of its electrons. H2 absorbers such as carbon nano tubes do not appear to work. Frank z -Original Message- From: Eric Walker To: vortex-l Sent: Sat, Apr 21, 2012 3:25 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant O

Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-21 Thread Eric Walker
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:09 AM, wrote: > > As far as Jones comment as finally..Its is finally not.. this was done 15 > years ago. Jones did ask a good question of why hydrogen in nickle and > why deuterium in palladium. It must have something to do with > a resonant condition at that speed.

Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-21 Thread fznidarsic
Thanks all. The reciprocal units are confusing to me. We usedreciprocal units in a solid state physics course to plot the velocity of phonons in a solid. The plot looked like a U. Its slope was the speed of the phonons. It was also confusing. The constant is a velocity. I believe it i

RE: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-21 Thread Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
http://library.rstheory.org/books/nbm/13.html -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 10:53 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant In reply to Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.'s message of Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:

Re: [Vo]:Znidarsic's constant

2012-04-20 Thread mixent
In reply to Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.'s message of Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:09:27 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Only three values are needed to perform all calculations: c, the Rydberg >frequency, and Avagadro's number. Almost any three natural constants are enough to derive all the rest. This is well known in physic