Re: Re: Long Delayed Echoes

2005-05-04 Thread Terry Blanton
> > From: Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > No, the question was, "doesn't anyone listen at radar frequencies, > without a directional antenna?" None that I know.

Re: Re: Long Delayed Echoes

2005-05-03 Thread Terry Blanton
> > From: Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > That still doesn't answer my question though. I'm sorry, the question was regarding googling echo returns from the moon?

Re: Re: Long Delayed Echoes

2005-05-02 Thread Terry Blanton
> > From: Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 01 May 2005 09:48:26 > -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >Because, it will be pointed in a different direction on signal return > >due to the rotation of the earth. > [snip] > ..and thus would not be picked u

Re: Re: Long Delayed Echoes

2005-04-29 Thread Terry Blanton
> > From: Robert Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/04/29 Fri PM 12:05:36 EDT > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: Long Delayed Echoes > > I believe that the delayed echoes are caused by electromagnetic ducting > around the earth. Perhaps, but then, how do you explain the doppler shif

Re: Re: Long Delayed Echoes

2005-04-29 Thread Terry Blanton
> > From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To receive a ham-generated signal 82 light hours from its point of > origin, using ham equipment, seems to me to require that the signal be > focused in some way. He supposedly has the proof; but, "focusing" is a possibility. Imagine you'