Jones Beene wrote:
Smoking Gun (one of several) ?
http://tinyurl.com/52e88
Smoking gun #2
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/11/WTC_DeathRoll2.html
Smoking gun # 3
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/globemovers.htm
These are all interesting, but they provide no support for the notion
that
Stephen
These are all interesting, but they provide no support for the
notion that anything more complex than airplanes where used to
bring down the buildings.
No Way ! No airplane struck WTC 7 ! and two other building between
WTC7 and the towers survived !
I'm not sure you read these
Hi Jones,
Thanks for the link. Yep, three for three was to much of a stretch. Somebody
got to confident.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 7:58 PM
Subject: Steve Jones Speaks
BYU Physics
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
You must have a bittorrent client to get this!
Do you think BT is safe? Weren't you abject toward .ram?
Finally - he apparently is sticking to just Building 7 and not the
towers
Did you bother with the NIST report that I referenced?
-Original Message-
From: RC Macaulay
Yep, three for three was to much of a stretch. Somebody got to
confident.
I presume you are at least open minded to CF by being on this list and
know the history of Fleischmann and Pons. If so, how can you hold that
opinion and support Steve
8:22 PM
Subject: Re: Steve Jones Speaks
-Original Message-
From: RC Macaulay
Yep, three for three was to much of a stretch. Somebody got to confident.
I presume you are at least open minded to CF by being on this list and
know the history of Fleischmann and Pons. If so, how can
Smoking Gun (one of several) ?
http://tinyurl.com/52e88
Smoking gun #2
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/11/WTC_DeathRoll2.html
Smoking gun # 3
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/globemovers.htm
9 matches
Mail list logo
