At 04:16 pm 19/08/2005 +0200, you wrote:
>Grimer wrote:
>
>> Well, "For unknown reasons, the addition of a small amount
>> of noble gas (such as helium, argon, or xenon) to the gas
>> in the bubble increases the intensity of the emitted light
>> dramatically."
>>
>> Since the reasons are unknow
At 10:51 am 19/08/2005 -0500, Harry wrote:
> Grimer wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Look at it this way. View the air molecules (the Alpha-atmosphere [A-a])
>> as dissolved in the Beta-atmosphere [B-a] which consists of particles of
>> neutral mass and neutral charge. Thus A-a pressure (15 psi) is only a tiny
>
Grimer wrote:
If the above is correct then presumably the spectrum
of the sonoluminescence will be different for different
noble gases. Is it, and if so, in what way? - and do you
know of a URL which might give this information?
Frank Grimer
Moin Frank,
You make a good point, the spectr
At 04:16 pm 19/08/2005 +0200, Knuke wrote:
>Moin Frank,
>
> Well, maybe, but probably not. At least, not with this given set of
> data. The noble gases are most generally used in light generating tubes
> at low atmospheres because they ionize easily enough, and then return
> to their original
Grimer wrote:
>
> Look at it this way. View the air molecules (the Alpha-atmosphere [A-a])
> as dissolved in the Beta-atmosphere [B-a] which consists of particles of
> neutral mass and neutral charge. Thus A-a pressure (15 psi) is only a tiny
> fraction of the B-a pressure (100,000 psi, say).
>
Grimer wrote:
Well, "For unknown reasons, the addition of a small amount
of noble gas (such as helium, argon, or xenon) to the gas
in the bubble increases the intensity of the emitted light
dramatically."
Since the reasons are unknown one might justifiably infer
that the researchers who dis
Pursuing the analogy between sonoluminescence and
the cavity magnetron, I googled the following very
intelligible description of the early development.
==
By 1939, other researchers had discovered
that under certain conditions, the magnetron
At 09:20 am 19/08/2005 +0200, Knuke wrote:
>Grimer wrote:
>
>> Now since the bubble is a very high pF (low Beta-
>> atmosphere pressure) cavity, it occurred to me that
>> one could see it as miniature cavity magnetron.
>>
>> Th combination of its small size and it low B-a
>> pressure [high ten
Grimer wrote:
Now since the bubble is a very high pF (low Beta-
atmosphere pressure) cavity, it occurred to me that
one could see it as miniature cavity magnetron.
Th combination of its small size and it low B-a
pressure [high tension if one will insist on using
an anthropomorphic datum ;-
Reading around the subject of sonoluminescence
I was interested to come across the following.
Single-bubble sonoluminescence pulses can
have very stable periods and positions.
In fact, the frequency of light flashes can
be more stable tha
--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, Merlyn wrote:
>
> > It is a very compelling theory Frank,
>
> You say the nicest things, Merlyn. 8-)
>
> > but I don't think it works out.
>
> But here comes the "but" ;^)
>
>
>
> >Picture it this way...
> >
> >I
In Putterman's Scientific American paper
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/Sonoluminescence/sono.pdf
which has already been referred to in a previous
post in this thread, there is a diagram of the
sonoluminescence spectrum. Under the diagram is
the following caption
=
MILLS BOMB
Developed during World War I, the Mills bomb
continued to serve as the standard British
grenade during the Second World War. It was
made of cast iron deeply serrated to fragment
easily. Pulling the grenade's pin released a
lever hol
At 07:30 am 23/07/2005 -0500, Fred wrote:
>Frank Grimer Sez:
---
>> What interests me is,
>>
>> electron - electron
>> proton - proton
>>
>> repulsion,
>>
>> and
>>
>> electron - proton
>> proton - electron
>>
>> "attraction"
>Here Here
Frank Grimer Sez:
>
> What interests me is,
>
> electron - electron
> proton - proton
>
> repulsion,
>
> and
>
> electron - proton
> proton - electron
>
> "attraction"
>
Here Here.
>
> I've put quotation marks around the word
> attraction cos it ain't the electron and the
> proton
At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, Merlyn wrote:
> It is a very compelling theory Frank...
There's something I've missed out on up to
this point to which I will now draw attention
in order to raise the "compulsion" compreture. 8-)
I am not at this stage interested in,
electron - electron
posit
At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, wrote:
>It is a very compelling theory Frank, but I don't
>think it works out.
>
Spurred on by Merlyn, the "Magickal Engineer and
Technical Metaphysicist", who by his own appelation
has obviously the right approach to the way out
thinking required for a conceptual
At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, Merlyn wrote:> It is a very
compelling theory Frank, You say the nicest things, Merlyn.
8-)> but I don't think it works out.But here comes the
"but" ;^)>--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> I
find myself in this situation with regard to the >> effect o
At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, Merlyn wrote:
> It is a very compelling theory Frank,
You say the nicest things, Merlyn. 8-)
> but I don't think it works out.
But here comes the "but" ;^)
>--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I find myself in this situation with regard to the
>> eff
It is a very compelling theory Frank, but I don't
think it works out.
--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find myself in this situation with regard to the
> effect of drop in Beta-atmospheric (B-a) pressure
> on the strength of the attraction and repulsion of
> positive and negative char
I have been re-reading Putterman's remarkably frank
and intelligible New Scientist article.
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/Sonoluminescence/sono.pdf
and found two very significant points which have
a direct bearing on the effect of reduced
Beta-atmosphere pressures.
The first bit which drew
Insight into a problem is a bit like experiencing
a vision. One "sees" something but doesn't know
what it means.
I find myself in this situation with regard to the
effect of drop in Beta-atmospheric (B-a) pressure
on the strength of the attraction and repulsion of
positive and negative charge
At 10:17 am 20/07/2005 +0200, you wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2005 05:46 schrieb Grimer:
>
>> Conceivably, in the limit, one could hydrinate all the
>> water in the apparatus. If it proved possible to trigger
>> the release of the hydrinated energy in a chain reaction
>> one would effectively hav
Am Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2005 05:46 schrieb Grimer:
> Conceivably, in the limit, one could hydrinate all the
> water in the apparatus. If it proved possible to trigger
> the release of the hydrinated energy in a chain reaction
> one would effectively have a high explosive water bomb.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
In the previous post in this thread I neglected to
consider the possible effect of hysteresis or
ratchetting of the sonoluminescent process.
Such a process is illustrated in the modified
"Denominator change" table below.
==
d not a little amusing ;-) ],
to see who else cottons on to the -
"Secret of Sonoluminescence".8^)
Cheers,
Frank Grimer
26 matches
Mail list logo
