In reply to thomas malloy's message of Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:31:39 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>>3 lbs per horsepower, using every dirty-trick in the book for enhancing
>>Lifter efficiency. That includes boosting ion-wind, specific field-shaping,
>>reversing the charge-polarity (power-supply runs negative), e
At 06:40 pm 30-12-04 -0500, you wrote:
>Terry scribes;
>'Tis far better to stone two birds and move in for the
>kill, matey.
>
>And I reply,
>
>"Leaving no bird unstoned, mon ami"
Don't ya mean?
"Leaving no tern unstoned." ;-)
tern:Any of various sea birds of the
genus Sterna a
Terry scribes;
'Tis far better to stone two birds and move in for the
kill, matey.
And I reply,
"Leaving no bird unstoned, mon ami"
happy gnu ears right back at ya.
K.
--- Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... finding a
> way to
> kill two birds with one stone...
'Tis far better to stone two birds and move in for the
kill, matey.
A toast to the New Year:
Here's to you as good as you are
And here's to me as bad as I am.
As good as you are
And as bad as
Thanks to RvS - correction to previous post:
... to be precise, I should have added "for one hour" in two
places.:
a rule-of-thumb about one kwh per pound of payload is
required for a helicopter to hover in place *for one
hour*
Also, it is a continuing oversight that I keep forgetting to
us
> What do you people think about lifting 3 pounds with a
horsepower, or
> 1 KW? of energy?
I suppose instead of just "lifting" you mean to "hover in
place" without the benefit of a wing (forward motion into an
airfoil); and instead of KW, which is NOT a unit of energy,
you mean kwh, which is a u
ednesday, December 29, 2004 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Unitel drive
Tim Ventura at www.americananitgravity.com
Dear Tim;
I was listening to you last night on C to C AM. Last time we talked I
questioned the efficacy of your design. I found your claim regarding
the amount of lift for
7 matches
Mail list logo
