Hi Reed,
This is essentially the two approaches to how you might implement a
"view" that I have been considering. On the one hand, you have some
kind of server-side trickery that basically serves up different data to
different people, so everyone just sees what they want to see. On the
other
I think this sounds like a very useful idea can't really think of much
I'd add :)
Ken
Peter Amstutz wrote:
> I just wanted to float another idea for a change in s4 to s5. Previously
> in s4, there was no well defined "root" of the vobject tree. Or rather,
> there was the site root, but listin
I love it. In fact I was thinking of something similar recently, I don't
remember the exact context -- but it had to do with mounting remote sites
(nfs? heh) and some distant relation to the OLPC's social mesh.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:03:47 -0500, Peter Amstutz wrote:
> I just wanted to float anot
I just wanted to float another idea for a change in s4 to s5.
Previously in s4, there was no well defined "root" of the vobject tree.
Or rather, there was the site root, but listing the contents of this
root would get you every vobject on the site, which was rarely what you
wanted.
I'm think
