On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:48:18PM -0700, Alexandra Thorn wrote:
>
> Could anyone very quickly tell me how to copy and paste text from the KDE
> Konsole to a file I can save (or else, how to save the Konsole text to
> file directly)? Been working on something for over an hour, and would
> like t
Bring up Kate or Kwrite, highlight the text with the mouse, middle-click
(or Ctrl-V) in the editor window. Then save the file.
-- Rod
http://www.sunsetsystems.com/
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 05:48 pm, Alexandra Thorn wrote:
> Could anyone very quickly tell me how to copy and paste text from t
Could anyone very quickly tell me how to copy and paste text from the KDE
Konsole to a file I can save (or else, how to save the Konsole text to
file directly)? Been working on something for over an hour, and would
like to go home and get dinner, but don't want to lose the record of what
I did.
On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:49:52AM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I think each sequence is completely independent of the others...
> > > in that the order of numbers in one cycle of all sequences
hi mike,
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pete,
>
> - Could you explain you want in the way of random numbers?
>
> (reproducible or not, how many over the life of the program, how long
> the program runs, etc...)
sure. reproducible is a requirement, since i've already used
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Mark K. Kim wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If your goal is play each song once in a random order, I don't see why
> > you don't just assign each song a random number, then sort the list
> > of songs by those random numbers to get the play list
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:06:37PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:01:14PM -0700, Samuel Merritt wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:49:13PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Is anyone using LVM here?
> >
> > I use LVM. Kernel 2.4.17, LVM version 1.0.1-rc4(ish)(
On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If your goal is play each song once in a random order, I don't see why
> you don't just assign each song a random number, then sort the list
> of songs by those random numbers to get the play list order. When the
> first play-songs pass is finishe
Pete,
- Could you explain you want in the way of random numbers?
(reproducible or not, how many over the life of the program, how long
the program runs, etc...)
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:16:00PM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > open up the
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:01:14PM -0700, Samuel Merritt wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:49:13PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is anyone using LVM here?
>
> I use LVM. Kernel 2.4.17, LVM version 1.0.1-rc4(ish)(03/10/2001).
Hi Sam,
I was digging around in ext2resize man pages, and n
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:49:13PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is anyone using LVM here?
I use LVM. Kernel 2.4.17, LVM version 1.0.1-rc4(ish)(03/10/2001).
--
Samuel Merritt
PGP key is at http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~merritt/snmerritt.asc
Information about PGP can be found at http://ww
hi mark,
begin Mark K. Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think each sequence is completely independent of the others...
> > in that the order of numbers in one cycle of all sequences will be
> > different.
>
> It generates the numbers in the same
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:49:52AM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I think each sequence is completely independent of the others...
> > in that the order of numbers in one cycle of all sequences will be
> > different.
>
> Not quite sure I understa
hi mike,
i've been writing down everything i know about random numbers with C.
thanks for the info! i hope to have something useful in a day or so.
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sometimes is very valuable to be able to have pseudo-random numbers
> which can re-generate a
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:44:21AM -0700, Mark K. Kim wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > These algorithms also tend to "cycle" back upon themselves, so
> > if they spit out (10, 5, 8, 20, ...) sometime millions of reads
> > later the same millions of numbers will be pulled
On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:23:07AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
[...]
> > and i assume it's not true across different computers?
>
> False, sequences will be the same across machines with the same CPU (1)
> using the same algorithm.
>
> 1: T
On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > and i assume it's not true across different computers?
>
> False, sequences will be the same across machines with the same CPU (1)
> using the same algorithm.
>
> 1: The main question is that the algorithm be the same, for integer
>based algo
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> thanks jeff!
>
> begin Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> >
> > > using the same seed will produce the same set of random numbers.
> >
> > srand->rand and srandom->random behave this way.
>
>
Is anyone using LVM here?
___
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
Pete,
Didn't study heavy math, this is what I have gathered... if someone
with a heavy math background would like to chip in that would be great.
Later,
Mike
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:23:07AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> using the same seed will produce the same set of random
thanks jeff!
begin Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 15 May 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
>
> > using the same seed will produce the same set of random numbers.
>
> srand->rand and srandom->random behave this way.
i forgot about srandom/random. the man pages say that rand/srand
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> using the same seed will produce the same set of random numbers.
srand->rand and srandom->random behave this way.
> i assume this is NOT true across reboots?
You can assume it IS true across reboots. These are purely numerical,
deterministic algo
using the same seed will produce the same set of random numbers.
i assume this is NOT true across reboots?
and i assume it's not true across different computers?
i'd do the experiment, but i'd rather not reboot my system right now.
does anyone know the answer offhand?
pete
___
23 matches
Mail list logo