Hi,
My friend is looking for a Dedicated Server. We need a place to keep the
Rack in Cyber Center.
Can somebody suggest me ISPs who does this job with a resonable pricing
cause we are not generating much revenues.
Have a great day.
Karthikeyan B
__
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Jim Angstadt wrote:
>
> --- Mike Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jim,
> >
> > Thanks for the output.
> >
> > Two observations:
> >
> > - You are using the wrong IP address when ssh'ing
> > from the rh7.2 box to
> > the rh8.0 box. rh8.0 is configured for IP addre
Mike Simons said:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 04:16:01PM -0800, Jim Angstadt wrote:
>> > Could you try this:
>> > # iptables -t filter -D INPUT 1 -p tcp -s
>> > 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.0.3\
>> > --destination-port 22 -j ACCEPT
>>
>> I get "Illegal option '-s' with this command".
>
> He meant a -A
--- Mike Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> Thanks for the output.
>
> Two observations:
>
> - You are using the wrong IP address when ssh'ing
> from the rh7.2 box to
> the rh8.0 box. rh8.0 is configured for IP address
> 192.168.0.3, and
> you ran ssh to 192.168.0.11. Try agai
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Jim Angstadt wrote:
> Hi Nino,
>
> During install I selected medium security and
> specified several servers that I wanted to run,
> including ssh.
Yeah after I sent the last email, I noticed that your iptables *seems* to
be allowing ssh in, but I'd still disable it just in c
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 04:16:01PM -0800, Jim Angstadt wrote:
> > Could you try this:
> > # iptables -t filter -D INPUT 1 -p tcp -s
> > 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.0.3\
> > --destination-port 22 -j ACCEPT
>
> I get "Illegal option '-s' with this command".
He meant a -A instead of -D, but I think
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 04:00:04PM -0800, ME wrote:
> Looking at the output from the iptables, I dont see a rule permitting
> packets with a syn flag set to port 22 for ssh.
Perhaps I've read it wrong... but
- The only TCP reject rule that has killed *any* packets got 6 packets.
- The machine is
--- ME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Angstadt said:
> > --- ME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Jim Angstadt said:
> Could you try this:
> # iptables -t filter -D INPUT 1 -p tcp -s
> 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.0.3\
> --destination-port 22 -j ACCEPT
I get "Illegal option '-s' with this comman
Jim,
Thanks for the output.
Two observations:
- You are using the wrong IP address when ssh'ing from the rh7.2 box to
the rh8.0 box. rh8.0 is configured for IP address 192.168.0.3, and
you ran ssh to 192.168.0.11. Try again with .3 ...
- You are running a firewall on the rh8.0 box... i
Jim Angstadt said:
> --- Nino Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Jim Angstadt wrote:
> My 3 boxes are behind a Netgear FR314 router which has
> a firewall. I have no idea just how good that
> firewall is.
Having extra rules does offer more security as you have two filters in
--- Nino Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Jim Angstadt wrote:
> I'm not sure if 8.0's firewall runs ipchains or
> iptables. You can check
> by typing "lsmod | grep ipchains". If you see a
> line there, then you can
> disable the firewall by typing "ipchains -F". If it
Jim Angstadt said:
> --- ME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jim Angstadt said:
>> [likely need works with filters]
>> > Could you give me a starting point for this,
>> please.
>>
>> Mike Simmons has asked for the output from two
>> commands in a response to
>> this. This should help you along this pa
--- Nino Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Jim Angstadt wrote:
> > Could you give me a starting point for this,
> please.
> > I'm totally ignorant on firewalls and filters.
>
> When you installed 8.0, did you include firewalling?
Hi Nino,
During install I selected medium
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Jim Angstadt wrote:
> Could you give me a starting point for this, please.
> I'm totally ignorant on firewalls and filters.
When you installed 8.0, did you include firewalling? The redhat-installed
firewall blocks out just about everything that is not selected as trusted.
--- ME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Angstadt said:
> [likely need works with filters]
> > Could you give me a starting point for this,
> please.
>
> Mike Simmons has asked for the output from two
> commands in a response to
> this. This should help you along this path.
>
> In addition to his
Hi Mike,
Here is the output you requested. Thanks for the
directions.
Jim
--- Mike Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:28:44PM -0800, Jim
> Angstadt wrote:
> > Immediately after failed ssh attempts, I did not
> find
> > any error messages in /var/log/messages.
> >
>
Jim Angstadt said:
[likely need works with filters]
> Could you give me a starting point for this, please.
Mike Simmons has asked for the output from two commands in a response to
this. This should help you along this path.
In addition to his request, could you also pass the contents of the files
--- ME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With only the data you have provided, it looks more
> like the interface is
> down, or an interface is improperly configured.
>
> Nothing can ping it.
> Nothing can ssh to it.
>
> If it cannot ping others, and/or canont ssh to
> others, this further adds
> to t
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:28:44PM -0800, Jim Angstadt wrote:
> Immediately after failed ssh attempts, I did not find
> any error messages in /var/log/messages.
>
> Below is a summary of my attempts to connect between
> various boxes. What should I do?
There are a number of possible problems..
With only the data you have provided, it looks more like the interface is
down, or an interface is improperly configured.
Nothing can ping it.
Nothing can ssh to it.
If it cannot ping others, and/or canont ssh to others, this further adds
to this as being more likely. (Pinging yourself is not a s
Hi All,
I've added a Red Hat 8.0 box to my home network. It
does not accept ssh or ping from the other boxes -
rh7.2 and win98 - on my home network. I want my linux
boxes to serve ssh to the other boxes on my network.
On the rh8.0 box, when I run:
netstat -at | grep ssh
it shows LISTEN.
Imm
This message is being duplicated here on vox-tech for those not on vox.
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:10:30PM -0500, Mike Simons wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:09:51PM -0500, Mike Simons wrote:
> > Yes, there were problems with DNS.
>
> It's unclear if all of the problems were solved...
22 matches
Mail list logo