Wow! Yeah, I just tested this on a newer system and it appears that the
older 2GB limit was dropped somewhere between the older and the newer 2.4
series kernels and ext2. There is nothing in the kernel changes file for
ext2 either.
Last notice in the CHANGES file ref max filesize is for .5:
"- Che
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:17:15PM -0800, Ricardo Anguiano wrote:
>
> I don't know that I understand the problem exactly, but what about
> something like knoppix on a diskless workstation?
>
> http://www.knoppix.com/
>
> It seems suited to public terminal life.
Well, the boxes have di
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:09:06PM -0800, Darrick Servis wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just joined the list. I work at DCTV among other things. I'm working on
> setting up a Public Access terminal for the Food Coop. Richard Lowenberg
> from DCN said you (LUGOD) were going to install Linux on a couple of
>
Hmm. I have several files that were over 2GB, One around 3GB, and the other
is 28GB. Im running ext2 as my filesystem. Ive searched using mc, recover
and debugfs, and they can find no trace of my wayward file. I guess I have
to give up at this point, though it is painful.
Thanks
Mike
- Or
Others on the list can correct me if I am wrong, but I think the max
filesize for ext2 and ext3 is 2GB while for ResierFS is in the Exabytes
but since Max block dev size for Linux-2.4 series is 2 Terabytes, this can
be an effective limit for all fs under this version kernel.
So, if you were using
hey all,
as some of you may notice i am writing this one from windows. at the installfest this weekend we did some updating on my machine and everything went fine. i shut it down, got home, and low and behold my ethernet card is no where to be found. it's a sony vaio pcgz505lek and i believe the
Darrick Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just joined the list. I work at DCTV among other things. I'm
> working on setting up a Public Access terminal for the Food Coop.
> Richard Lowenberg from DCN said you (LUGOD) were going to install
> Linux on a couple of terminals but you're waiting for
Hi
Just joined the list. I work at DCTV among other things. I'm working on
setting up a Public Access terminal for the Food Coop. Richard Lowenberg
from DCN said you (LUGOD) were going to install Linux on a couple of
terminals but you're waiting for the new version of Debian to come out.
An
Okay more details.
My network has 4 systems on it. The two important systems in this case are
praxis and buffy. praxis is a linux system running debian woody(2.4.19
kernel), and buffy is a toshiba laptop running windows XP.
I ran a full save backup on buffy using the ntbackup tool that comes w
This sounds like one of those problems that depends
completely on the smallest details. I think it was Einstein
who said a problem cannot be solved at the same level of
awareness with which it was created. :-)
I don't know if anyone here can help, but if we can you'll
have to give more info. Li
Hey,
I have a problem where I seem to have lost around
10GB of data from a backup of a PC I have. The file was not rm'd. I
suspect that the program that wrote it trashed it(I admit Im not totally
sure.) What happened was I ran a backup under XP to a netdrive that
resides on my linux sys
> ---ORIGINAL MESSAGE---
> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:43:16 -0500
> From: Mike Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [vox-tech] re: gnome toolbars
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:05:52AM -0500, Mike Simons wrote:
> > I'm away from a graphi
begin karthikeyan.balasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > you probably mean ext3. i'm fairly certain redhat doesn't use vanilla
> > ext2 anymore.
>
> Hmm kind of strange, I bet i saw this option in the CD i got and it sure is
> Redhat 8.0.
>
> I also saw ext3 but when i was searching stuff f
> you probably mean ext3. i'm fairly certain redhat doesn't use vanilla
> ext2 anymore.
Hmm kind of strange, I bet i saw this option in the CD i got and it sure is
Redhat 8.0.
I also saw ext3 but when i was searching stuff for dual boot i saw people
mentioning only ext2 and vfat.
by the way wh
begin karthikeyan.balasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Oh btw sorry for cross posting. It a pretty interesting concept though. I
> thought cross posting is
> something like we should not have To address to vox-tex as well CC to vox.
hi karthikeyan,
crossposting means sending the same email to
15 matches
Mail list logo
