Your Win2k machine might be trying to be the domain controller, but
unable, because Linux is taking over that job. Also, SMB is such a flaky
service that it just refuses to work sometimes... or more often than not.
I've had that problem millions of times. It's just the way it is. :-(
As for the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:57:07PM -0800, Jan W wrote:
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dear jeff, mike and jan,
> >
> > new information. i should mention this, because it's relevent. we have
> > three main computers:
> >
> > satan linux my main system. has printer.
> > navalle li
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 11:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>i can browse linux from win98
>i can browse win98 from linux
>
>i can browse win2k from win98
>i can browse win2k from linux
>
>i can NOT browse win98 from win2k.
>i can NOT browse linux from win2k.
I'd try creating a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dear jeff, mike and jan,
>
> new information. i should mention this, because it's relevent. we have
> three main computers:
>
> satan linux my main system. has printer.
> navalle linux/win98rhonda's main system / engineering stuff
> lucifer linux/w
dear jeff, mike and jan,
new information. i should mention this, because it's relevent. we have
three main computers:
satan linux my main system. has printer.
navalle linux/win98rhonda's main system / engineering stuff
lucifer linux/win2kmy gaming machine / flash stuff
rece
I'm no M$ expert, but I have set up samba to talk to most flavors of
windows
--- Michael J Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:25:27AM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > i'm trying to set up samba to share files between linux (satan) and
> > win2k (lucifer).
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:37:49AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i'm glad this was mentioned because i was planning on installing the
> DIMMs backwards. thankfully i read this in time, and know better now...
>
> ;)
>
> pete
Don't laugh, but I worked somewhere where someone basically forced
i'm glad this was mentioned because i was planning on installing the
DIMMs backwards. thankfully i read this in time, and know better now...
;)
pete
On Tue 28 Oct 03, 10:31 AM, Richard Burkhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Last time I heard 128 pins = 128 pins.
>
> But 128 pins, rotated 180 d
Last time I heard 128 pins = 128 pins.
But 128 pins, rotated 180 degrees so that the notch-key is in the wrong
place, and then forced in with 'Armstrong Torque(tm)' is contra-indicated in
the motherboard user manual.
> -Original Message-
> On Tue 28 Oct 03, 8:57 AM, Michael J Wenk <[EMA
On Tue 28 Oct 03, 8:57 AM, Michael J Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:48:29AM -0800, Rod Roark wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 October 2003 07:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > can you use faster DIMMs, say 2100PC, on a machine rated for slower DIMMs?
> >
> > Yes, as far a
On Monday 27 October 2003 07:08 pm, David Siedband wrote:
> For a more generic prototyping tool have a look at.
> http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/
Wish they had some screenshots, but the description sounds
promising. Thanks!
> For a more customized web interface check out Zope
> Just set up yo
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:48:29AM -0800, Rod Roark wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2003 07:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > can you use faster DIMMs, say 2100PC, on a machine rated for slower DIMMs?
>
> Yes, as far as I know.
>
Id be careful of voltage requirements. Also, I know this goes wi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:25:27AM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> i'm trying to set up samba to share files between linux (satan) and
> win2k (lucifer).
>
> earlier, when double clicking "computers near me", i'd get both lucifer
> and satan, but double clicking satan gave an error that i can't
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 07:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> can you use faster DIMMs, say 2100PC, on a machine rated for slower DIMMs?
Yes, as far as I know.
-- Rod
___
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo
can you use faster DIMMs, say 2100PC, on a machine rated for slower DIMMs?
i got new memory for one of my faster machines and would like reuse the
DIMMs to beef up the memory on some of my older machines (which still
take DIMMs, just slower rated DIMMs).
pete
--
GPG Instructions: http://www.dir
i'm trying to set up samba to share files between linux (satan) and
win2k (lucifer).
earlier, when double clicking "computers near me", i'd get both lucifer
and satan, but double clicking satan gave an error that i can't remember
right now. so i tinkered with it.
i came across a registry patch o
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 01:32, Rob Rogers wrote:
> Correct, but just for the record, you don't need to manually back up the
> MBR, LILO does it automatically.
BUt in order for LILO -u to work, you *have* to have a backup of the MBR
somewhere. If you've destroyed the Linux partitions and rewritten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PÃ tisdag, 28 oktober 2003, skrev Ivor Bradaric:
>
> Dear Dispatcher,
> I installed Red Hat Linux onto my computer during the installfest at UC
> Davis on October 5. As I was not able to access any sites on the Internet
> other than the Red Hat home
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:40:35 -0800 (PST), David Margolis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Michael J Wenk wrote:
You do this(as I recall) lilo -U
If I remember correctly, the _restore_ feature of lilo requires that you
backed up the original MBR somewhere.
Correct, but just for the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:46:24AM -0800, Gabriel Rosa wrote:
>
>
> I'm running screen on my debian testing box, and I can't seem to get it to
> start up with a login shell. what I get is:
>
> bash-2.05b$ (PS1 is \s-\v\$)
>
> which is what happens even when i have 'deflogin on' in my .screenrc
I'm running screen on my debian testing box, and I can't seem to get it to
start up with a login shell. what I get is:
bash-2.05b$ (PS1 is \s-\v\$)
which is what happens even when i have 'deflogin on' in my .screenrc or when i
run screen explicitly with the '-l' option.
what i want is:
[EMAI
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Michael J Wenk wrote:
>
> You do this(as I recall) lilo -U
>
If I remember correctly, the _restore_ feature of lilo requires that you
backed up the original MBR somewhere.
My solution for this very same issue in the past was to boot back into
linux (a boot floppy will do),
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Ken Bloom wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 09:54:59PM -0800, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 21:02, Mark K. Kim wrote:
> > > > You can't uninstall LILO like that. Uninstalling LILO recreates
> > > > th
23 matches
Mail list logo
