Re: [vox-tech] bandwidth question - choking http to give more to ssh

2004-07-02 Thread Troy Arnold
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:12:51PM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: hi all, i have a remote web server. i also ssh into that same machine for mail. is there a way to give the bandwidth for my interactive ssh session priority over the bandwidth of everything else (in particular the web

Re: [vox-tech] bandwidth question - choking http to give more to ssh

2004-07-02 Thread Bill Kendrick
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:44:53AM -0700, Troy Arnold wrote: On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:12:51PM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: hi all, i have a remote web server. i also ssh into that same machine for mail. is there a way to give the bandwidth for my interactive ssh session priority

Re: [vox-tech] bandwidth question - choking http to give more to ssh

2004-07-02 Thread Gabriel Rosa
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:54:44AM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote: Gabe Rosa also did a talk on Linux Traffic Shaping back in March: http://www.lugod.org/presentations/trafficshaping/ That might be useful, as well... I wish the cruddy little router appliances could do this kind of stuff. :)

Re: [vox-tech] bandwidth question - choking http to give more to ssh

2004-07-02 Thread Bill Kendrick
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:55:55AM -0700, Gabriel Rosa wrote: The WRT54g with enhanced firmware can do full blown QoS. The default firmware does some, but not all that great. That sounds cool. But, uh... isn't that this one? (From early last month...)

Re: [vox-tech] bandwidth question - choking http to give more to ssh

2004-07-02 Thread Gabriel Rosa
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:11:33AM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:55:55AM -0700, Gabriel Rosa wrote: The WRT54g with enhanced firmware can do full blown QoS. The default firmware does some, but not all that great. That sounds cool. But, uh... isn't that this one?

Re: [vox-tech] bandwidth question - choking http to give more to ssh

2004-07-02 Thread Bill Kendrick
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:14:43AM -0700, Gabriel Rosa wrote: Besides, the single brain-cell fix is to change the default password. Mm... Maybe I'm thinking of one that was a COMPLETE nightmare and had a backdoor. And their 'fix' for it was to release a new firmware with a /different/ backdoor