Why LILO? I can't think of a single thing LILO can do that Grub can not do
better.
If you have an older kernel available in the menu, boot to that. Then check
for updates again. Sometimes the headers don't download completely on older
releases. If so, then install those and try to reboot with
Quoting Darth Borehd (darth.bor...@gmail.com):
Why LILO? I can't think of a single thing LILO can do that Grub can not do
better.
1. Simplicity.
2. Ability to boot any arbitrary filesystem without the need for the
bootloader to understand filesystem semantics.[1]
[1] This isn't a
On Tue 24 Nov 09, 11:01 AM, Rick Moen r...@linuxmafia.com said:
Quoting Darth Borehd (darth.bor...@gmail.com):
Why LILO? I can't think of a single thing LILO can do that Grub can not do
better.
1. Simplicity.
2. Ability to boot any arbitrary filesystem without the need for the
Quoting Peter Jay Salzman (p...@dirac.org):
I think I understand what you're saying, but I believe the argument
for simplicity is more compelling from the point of view of the person
using the application, not the application itself.
Over a decade-plus of observing, 100% of those seemed to
Hi,
Some answers:
Why LILO? Because the installation scripts failed to produce a bootable system
when I selected Grub. So I selected LILO and it work.
The update was from kernel 2.6.24-22 to 2.6.24-23. The original installation I
believe had 2.6.24-21.
One of our IT guys was able to boot