Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Bill Broadley
On 09/01/2010 11:25 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: > On 09/01/2010 10:28 PM, Bill Broadley wrote: >>> While I like the 2.5" drive option, I don't see them having the capacity >>> I need and I'm not sure if I can find as good of external cases for them >> >> The URL I included was a 2.5" drive, 1TB, and has

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Alex Mandel
On 09/01/2010 10:28 PM, Bill Broadley wrote: >> While I like the 2.5" drive option, I don't see them having the capacity >> I need and I'm not sure if I can find as good of external cases for them > > The URL I included was a 2.5" drive, 1TB, and has a nice external case. > I assume power consump

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Alex Mandel
On 09/01/2010 10:08 PM, Tony Cratz wrote: > On 09/01/2010 10:03 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: >> I am thinking about 2x 2TB actually, one on-site and one offsite cloned >> with something like drbd. Since I always seem to be expanding my photos >> and science data, I easily see the need for additional 2 TB

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Bill Broadley
> While I like the 2.5" drive option, I don't see them having the capacity > I need and I'm not sure if I can find as good of external cases for them The URL I included was a 2.5" drive, 1TB, and has a nice external case. > (need to look more). 2x 1TB drives just seems to double the number of > c

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Tony Cratz
On 09/01/2010 10:03 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: > I am thinking about 2x 2TB actually, one on-site and one offsite cloned > with something like drbd. Since I always seem to be expanding my photos > and science data, I easily see the need for additional 2 TB drives in a > couple of years (another reason

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Alex Mandel
On 09/01/2010 09:45 PM, Bill Broadley wrote: > On 09/01/2010 01:56 PM, Nick Schmalenberger wrote: >> I've often heard that the highest capacity drives available >> usually have the most platters and so are less reliable because >> of more moving parts > > Sort of. The parts of a multiple platter

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Bill Broadley
On 09/01/2010 01:56 PM, Nick Schmalenberger wrote: > I've often heard that the highest capacity drives available > usually have the most platters and so are less reliable because > of more moving parts Sort of. The parts of a multiple platter drive are bigger and heavier than those of a single p

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Nick Schmalenberger
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:56:35PM -0700, Nick Schmalenberger wrote: > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:16:25PM -0700, Alex Mandel wrote: > > For those who recall my previous thread, I'm currently searching for > > some backup drives. Based on feedback here, discussions and readings > > external usb driv

Re: [vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Nick Schmalenberger
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:16:25PM -0700, Alex Mandel wrote: > For those who recall my previous thread, I'm currently searching for > some backup drives. Based on feedback here, discussions and readings > external usb drives sound like the way to go (networked via some low > power mini computer or

[vox-tech] External vs. Bare Drive/Case

2010-09-01 Thread Alex Mandel
For those who recall my previous thread, I'm currently searching for some backup drives. Based on feedback here, discussions and readings external usb drives sound like the way to go (networked via some low power mini computer or routerish device). Now the hard part, trying to find some reliable h